This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Issues with damaged INA210

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: INA210, INA213, INA282, INA283

We have come upon a situation where the INA210 suffers from unrecoverable damage in some, but not all, our produced units. When the circuit is damaged, one of two things happen: Either the output voltage matches the applied VCC voltage, or the output is short circuited to one of the input pins.

We have investigated three possible conditions that we suspected might have been the culprit:

1. Common mode voltages in excess of +26V - This might have been the case on an earlier design. However, this was improved a few months back, by changing the zener diode controlling an overvoltage protection thyristor from 24V to 20V. No bench-top testing since has produced common mode voltages in excess of 20V.

2. Fast transients - The new datasheet warns about transients greater than 20kV/uS, as they might trigger the ESD protection circuitry. We have searched all our transients thoroughly, and never seen any transients exceeding 2 kV/uS - a decade lower than the specified limit.

3. Negative common mode voltages - Our design seemed to suffer from negative common mode voltages far beyond the -0.3V limit set by the datasheet. We did a bench-top test using an RC-filter at the inputs to reduce this effect. With our current set-up, the greatest negative pulse is -0.24V at 880nS, but even at this level we are experiencing damaged ICs.

We are using Version A of the IC. It is worth noting that we are also using a INA213 in reverse parallel to measure reverse current with a different resolution, and we have not seen a single failure on this IC.

As far as we can tell, we are within all boundaries set by the datasheet, and completely at loss of any new ideas. Our production line is halted until this issue is resolved, and any help on the matter would be greatly appreciated.

  • Hello Hans,

    The datasheet states 2kV/us...not 20kV/us. 

    Have you tried the recommended input filtering as shown in Figure 29? 

    Finally, have you tried replacing the rev A device with a rev B?  If you get failures with rev B then it's most likely due to negative common-mode voltage.

  • Hello.

     Yes, a little typo regarding transients: The datasheet states 2kV/us and our measurements never exceeds 200V/us.

    We are unfortunately not able to use the specified input filtering, as this line carries serial communication that can't handle the capacitance.

    We have also done some tests with rev B, where 1 in 10 ICs failed, as opposed to 3 in 10. But this might just be a matter of statistic insignificance.

     At any rate, we are changing the design to INA282 and INA283 to make sure we are within the maximum ratings. This however leads to a question regarding the ability to withstand all conditions when VCC is unpowered. This was highlighted in the INA210 datasheet, but is a bit unclear in the IN282/283 datasheet. We are actively powering up and down the ICs to save on power consumption, but if this should pose a problem, we can do a hardwire to 3V3 and remove software control of the power.

     

    Regards

    Hans Olav