This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM2907-N: C2 Calculation

Part Number: LM2907-N


I am currently trying to specify the sampling rate of an external ADC measuring the voltage of the LM2907-N for a legacy design.  (I understand that this is not the most efficient method of doing things, but this is the required architecture)

According to the LM2907-N datasheet (SNAS555D –JUNE 2000–REVISED DECEMBER 2016) section 9.1:

"C2 acts as a filter to smooth the pulses of current and does not affect the output voltage. However, the size of C2 determines both the output response time for changes in frequency and the amount of output voltage ripple."

however the datasheet never mentions how to calculate the response time of the circuit.  Should I assume it is limited by the time constant t = R1C2?

  • Hi Jeff,

    have you also read this application note?

    www.ti.com/.../snaa088

    What is the LM2907-N doing in your circuit?

    Kai
  • Hi Jeff,

    Let us know if you still have questions after reviewing SNAA088.

    Regards, Thomas

    Precision Amplifiers Applications Engineering

  • In response to both questions above:

    What is the LM2907-N doing in your circuit?:

    LM2907-N is used to convert a variable frequency flow meter output (0 - 1.8khz) to an analog output (0-5VDC)

    It is configured as described in figure 3 of snaa088 with a voltage divider on the output
    C1 = 1nF
    C2 = 1uF
    R1 = 70K ohms

    Have you also read this application note? www.ti.com/.../snaa088

    Yes I have read the application note.

    Page 4, Section “Choosing R1, C1 and C2” describes the process of selecting C2 in regards to ripple voltage Pk-Pk with the following explanation:

    “It appears R1 can be chosen independent of ripple, however response time, or the time it takes VOUT to stabilize at a new frequency increases as the size of C2 increases, so a compromise between ripple, response time, and linearity must be cosen carefully”


    Unfortunately this still does not answer my original question of response time, nor does it provide a graph or example I could use as a reference to derive the response time.
  • Hi Jeff,

    Unfortunately, the only information we have about the LM2907-N is the datasheet and the AN-162 Applications Note, which doesn't address the response time to any depth. I've attempted to find a way to calculate it, but that would be a lengthy process of an unknown outcome.

    Probably the best way to get to a response time number is to measure it. I have a test board designed for the LM2907-N, but need to have some fabricated. If you can wait a couple of weeks, I can have some boards fabricated and then do bench measurements.

    You mention a 0 to 5 V analog output, I presume that is the input step you need the response time information for? Also, what is your circuit's supply voltage?

    Regards, Thomas

    Precision Amplifiers Applications Engineering

  • Hi Jeff,

    Do you still need assistance with your LM2907-N application? We have had some PC boards fabricated that accommodate the LM2907-N and can do some reasonable testing. We would need to know the specific LM2907-N package type you are using, the exact circuit configuration, the supply voltage applied to the circuit, and the input voltage step for which you need the response time.

    If you have progressed beyond this point with the project development and no longer need the information, please let us know.

    Regards, Thomas

    Precision Amplifiers Applications Engineering
  • Jeff

    We haven't heard back from you so we assume you were able to resolve your issue. If not, just post another reply below.

    Thanks
    Dennis