This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Basic Isolation and Reinforced Digital Isolator



Hi team,

  I'd like to ask a question on the difference between Basic Isolation and Reinforced Digital Isolator

  I understand isolation performance is quantified at the component level by parameters such as VIORM, VIOWM, VIOTM, VISO, etc.. Does it mean all the reinforced sockets have better prformance(specs mentioned above) than basic isolation sockets?

  Is there a specific parameter we can differetiate whether the device is basic or reinforced isolated? Thanks.

Regards,
Patrick

  • Patrick,

    Check out this FAQ  that addresses Basic and Reinforced isolation. Let me know if you have any further questions.

    Respectfully,

    Lucas Schulte

  • Hi Lucas,
    I've checked the FAQ and I understand the key differetian will be passing 10KV surger test for reinforced isolation but it cannot answer my confusion on 'Does it mean all the reinforced sockets have better prformance(specs mentioned above) than basic isolation sockets?'
    I didn't go through the UL/IEC regulation so would you help me with the question? Thanks.

    Regards,
    Patrick
  • Hi Patrick,

    Lucas is out of office due to Christmas and New Year, I will try to answer your question.
    In most cases, the reinforced isolation devices are generally going to be much better in performances especially with respect to high voltage performance. If you are referring only to digital isolators, currently ISO77xx & ISO78xx are our latest devices that offer reinforced isolation and are much better in performance compared all other older family of devices.

    Let me know if you have any other related question, thanks.


    Regards,
    Koteshwar Rao