Other Parts Discussed in Thread: INA826, , OPA187, TINA-TI
Hi,
According to spec, OPA187/OPA4187's CMRR is 140dB,typ, and INA826's is 95/115/130dB,typ with respect to Gain 1/10/100.
To get higher CMRR at 60Hz, use 3pcs of OPA187 (named OPA187_INA) as INA826 as attached figure.
Here is the CMRR simulation result (from Tina-TI) of both OPA187_INA and INA826 with Gain 33 and source resistance 10Kohm,
#1. OPA187_INA & INA826 CMRR at 60Hz: -192.1dB & -145.6dB if there is no source resistance imbalance (+IN/-IN: 10Kohm).
#2. OPA187_INA & INA826 CMRR at 60Hz: -137.5dB & -139.2dB if there is 1Kohm source resistance imbalance (+IN: 10Kohm, -IN: 9Kohm).
From Tina-TI simulation result, if no source resistance imbalance, OPA187_INA CMRR performance is very good, but if with 1Kohm imbalance, OPA187_INA CMRR has a big drop of 54.6dB compared to INA826. Is that big CMRR drop of OPA187_INA reasonable? To count in source imbalance, is INA826 the better solution than OPA187_INA? Please make comments.
Thanks.
Ming
