This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

INA219: Asking for the INA219 design suggestion

Part Number: INA219
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: INA233

 

Hi Sir,

 

My customer would like design INA219 to replace INA233 due to cost reason. INA233 was used for previous project.

Would you please review schematic/ layout and provide your comment?

 

four current steps. 

 

Step1à20V/0.25A

Step2à20V/0.5A

Step3à20V/0.75A

Step4à20V/1A

BR,

SHH

  • Hello SHH,

    I will note one mistake in the schematic. R7127 and R7132 should be 0-Ω resistors. The device may not work if the address pins are not pulled with 0-Ω resistors.

    The input sense voltage range is 2.5mV to 10mV with 10mΩ shunt. This range easily works with both and many other devices.

    The schematics look fine, but I am having trouble with layout. Could you please send screenshots of the current sensors and shunt resistor circuitry? As long as the recommended layouts are practiced then this should work fine. Although there is not much to go off on without knowing the max possible common-mode voltage at inputs (how high can +20V_DS rail be? The INA219 is going to have higher error because of it less accurate offset and gain error specs. Please address the error allowed in your system and check if the INA219's specification will be compatible.

    Another difference is that the INA219 does not support the PMBUS interface and has a different register set so some host device firmware will need to be different.

    Consider learning about determining error for all of our devices using our training videos here.

    Sincerely,

    Peter

  • Hi Peter,

    thanks for feedback.

    Would you please install the PAD free viewer to open the layout?

    txn.box.com/.../ux6jvebpfm2fcesqkna1bqazvtytn0x4

    20V may has 10% variance. is that ok?

    BR,

    SHH

  • Hey SHH,

    10% variance is fine. I am asking mainly about any AC or transient behavior on this rail.

    Anyway. I have looked at the pcb file and the layout is fine. I have responded to you privately on a suggestion for layout improvement.

    Sincerely,

    Peter

  • Hi Peter, 

    the transient may has 150% to 200% at the current peak.

    I did not see the privately message on the suggestions. would you please send to my mail? a0219340@ti.com

    BR,

    SHH

  • I have replied back.

    Best,

    Peter