This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
This is a question from my customer, can you comment? Please let me know if more info is needed.
Thanks.
From Customer:
I'm using the PCM4202 (24-bit audio A/D converter) in a new design.
I'm running the PCM4202 in the following mode:
- Data format is 24-bit I2S
- Slave Mode
- Single Rate with Clock Auto-Detect
- Enable High Pass Filter
The problem I'm having is when I measure the THD (total harmonic distortion), the THD at 32 kHz and 48 kHz sampling is about -67 dB and the THD at 44.1 kHz sampling is -89 dB.
All measurements done with a 1 kHz test tone with an Audio Precision test instrument set for a 22 to 22 kHz flat filter.
I've done a lot of other testing which I won't go into but everything I've done suggests the crappy THD problem at 32 and 48 kHz sampling is related to the PCM4202 only and not to any external circuits.
When I substitute a PCM1804 in place of the PCM4202 (everything else being identical) the THD is around -85 dB for all sampling rates (32, 44.1, and 48 kHz).
Why is the THD for the PCM4202 so lousy for 32 and 48 kHz sampling and OK for 44.1 kHz sampling?
Hi, Tom,
Who is your customer, application, and volumes associated with this?
-d2
Hi, Tom,
Did you see my email on Monday?
Does his clocking follow the data in Table 1 of the d/s?
-d2
Hi Don,
Sorry, been traveling. This is for Harris Broadcast Group.I'll send you the product brochure in a separate email. I'll ask about the clocking.
-Tom
I'm using a 256fs clock. So 8.192, 11.2896, 12.288 MHz for 32,44,1 and 48 kHz sampling respectively.
I haven't tried 384fs, 512fs etc. Does that "fix it"?