This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMH1983: TOF1 Pulse width

Part Number: LMH1983
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH1980,

Hi Team,

Could you advise about TOF1 Pulse width.

Our system use LMH1980 + LMH1983 for genlock.

In according to LMH1983 Document, TOF1 Pulse width is equart to 1 x H period.

quote:

But, in our experimentation, TOF1 Pulse width is measured 5 x H period.

LMH1983 register setting is below.
Do I need to change any settings?

Thanks

Best regards,

Sohhei

  • Hi Okada-san,

    I need to find the right person to support this question, please allow a few days for this. Thank you.

  • Hello Okada-san,

    I apologize for the delay.  I wanted to see if this issue was still present?

    I note the text says, if the TOF is aligned, will be a pulse with a width of 1 x H period....

    • It seems the TOF is aligned with HIN, is that do you have the understanding that TOF is aligned (and therefore should be only 1 pulse?)

    You are testing with an NTSC signal?

    73,
    Timothy

  • Noel-san, Timothy-san, 

    Thank you for reply.

     I wanted to see if this issue was still present?
    Yes,,, I'd like to clarify the reason.

    do you have the understanding that TOF is aligned
    Yes, I think TOF is aligned, because LMH1983 register ALIGN STATUS(0x0001[6]) is H.

    You are testing with an NTSC signal?
    LMH1983 register INPUT FORMAT(0x0020) is 0x15. ->1080I29.97
    Does that answer your question?

    BR,
    Sohhei

  • Hi Okada-san,

    Timothy and I do not familiar with this part, we will need to setup an EVM to verify. We estimated that we will have the EVM and test equipment ready by end of May. 

    BTW, would you educate us what is the impact to the system if TOF is longer than 1x H?