CDCDB800: CDCDB800RSL Clock output VOH level

Part Number: CDCDB800

Tool/software:

Hello, at TI,

What Clock output VOH can be expected for this part on a single pin. 

The spec shows VOH = 225 - 270mV on page 7. 

Is this correct? It seems low.

Thanks,

Tom

  • Hi Tom,

    The figure of 225 - 270 mV is a figure that is guaranteed by the chip's design and characterization. The output V_OH that you should expect to see on a pin with a load is 660 - 850 mV.

    Thanks,

    Michael

  • Hi Michael,  

    Thanks for the info provided!

    Do you know what conditions might cause the device to operate in the 225mV to 270mV range? 

    Wondering if it would it be a lower impedance load, or maybe temperature related?

    Thanks, and Best Regards,

    Tom

  • Hi Tom,

    The 225-270 mV measurement was a single-ended measurement performed with a DC test load. The 660-850 mV measurement is a double-ended measurement performed with an AC test load. Note, in addition, that the swing can be controlled with a termination resistor, as the output driver format is LP-HCSL (a current based driver).

    Thanks,

    Michael

  • Hi Michael, 

    Am I understanding correctly that the 225 - 270 mV is seen on one line to GND, and the 660 - 850mV is a differential measurement between both REFCLK lines?   I am driving this clock into a Microchip PCI1400 which has a V_IH_min of 0.796V so I would expect it not to work at all. It works most of the time, but I feel we may have a VOH vs VIH miss match. VIH min for the PCI11400 is VDD11 - 0.350V. My VDD11 is biased at 1.146V.   We are using the 49.9 ohm REFClk term Resistors also. 

    Thanks for all the help!

    Tom

  • Hi Tom,

    Your understanding is correct. 

    796 mV is a spec that the V_OH should be able to satisfy (given that it is within the supported range), but could you measure the typical peak-to-peak voltage from that output? If there is still concern about the swing not being great enough, you could increase the value of your termination resistors. 

    Thanks,

    Michael