This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CDCLVC1104: Compared with CDCV304

Part Number: CDCLVC1104
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CDCLVC1102, CDCV304

Tool/software:

Here're the comparison table.

However, customer would like to know which one is preference to adapt in industrial and what're the major differences in between? And also what the process for both are?

Application: Servo Drive for Industrial application. 

                  

Parameter

CDCLVC1102/03/04

CDCV304PWR

Unit

Package

TSSOP (3.00 mm x 4.4 mm)

TSSOP (3.00 mm x 4.4 mm)

NA

Number of Inputs

1

1

NA

Input Type

LVCMOS

LVCMOS

NA

Number of Outputs

2/3/4

4

NA

Output Type

LVCMOS

LVCMOS

NA

Operating Temperature Range

-40 to 85

-40 to 85

C

Supply Voltage

2.5, 3.3

2.5, 3.3

V

Maximum Output Frequency

250

200

MHz

Maximum Additive Jitter

100  (at 250MHz)

56 ( Typical Value at 125MHz)

fs

Maximum Output Skew

50

100

ps

Maximum Part-to-part Skew at 3.3 V

500

400

ps

Maximum Propogation Delay  at 3.3 V

2

3

ns

Maximum Rise/Fall Time at 3.3 V

0.8

0.825 (0.4 V to 2 V)

ns

Output Enable Pin

Yes

Yes

NA

  • CDCLVC1102 is the device targeted towards industrial applications. 
    CDCV304 is meant for PCI-X applications. 

    In theory customer can use either or as long as the electrical specifications are met. 
    We also have LMK1C with a much lower noise floor if PN performance is of concern. LMK1C has the lowest noise floor of all our devices. It's very suitable when the reference clock is a sine wave to improve the slew rate. 

    Best regards, 

    Vicente