LMK00105: 2:1 single-ended low-jitter MUX solution

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK00105, LMK00804B, LMK00101, CDCLVC1310, LMK1C1102

We have a timing-critical clock/sync distribution application and would appreciate some clarification on a few points, or indeed get your recommendation on a better solution, if one exists!

We have two potential SYNC clock sources and would like a 2:1 Single-Ended MUX solution, so we can route one or other of those signals to a sensor, with low jitter.  Unfortunately it seems that 2:1 Single-Ended low jitter MUX solutions are hard to come by!

The signals involved range from a few kHz to 100 MHz and are 1.8 V single-ended, specifically from either:

  • a low jitter clock buffer output (~1V/ns output slew rate, Renesas 5PB1102CMGI8 part which cannot unfortunately be changed).
  • or an FPGA I/O output.

We've narrowed potential options down to LMK00105, LMK00101, LMK00804B and CDCLVC1310 (although the 10x outputs seem a bit over the top!)

We've also considered a solution with 2x additional clock buffers, each with an output enable feature and the outputs tied together, though it doesn't seem possible to find suitable buffers with Hi-Z outputs when disabled.

LMK00804B

1. Single-ended input amplitude

Initially this device looked promising, but in Section 7.7 (LVCMOS / LVTTL DC Characteristics), the LVCMOS_CLK input specifies VIH(min) = 2.0 V

Given that our clock sources are 1.8 V LVCMOS, does this mean that a 1.8 V clock is not guaranteed/supported on the LVCMOS_CLK input?

I came across the following E2E thread:

https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1537439/lmk00804b-lmk00804bpwr-output-high-level-abnormal-oscillation

In that discussion, it appears the user changed their input signal from 3.3 V to 1.8 V and the device continued to operate, which prompted some questions regarding the supported input levels and recommended configurations?


2. Recommended bias network

In Figure 12, the driven input has a 100R resistor to VDD and a 100R resistor to GND.

With a 1.8 V source, this presents a relatively heavy load (~18 mA sink current when the source drives LOW). Our clock buffer doesn't specify a max sink/source current.


LMK00101/LMK00105
3. Single-ended input amplitude

The datasheets specify a single-ended input voltage swing: VI_SE = 0.3 V to 2.0 V

Presumably a 0 V to 1.8 V clock would be considered a valid single-ended input signal for the CLK/nCLK input pair?


LMK00101/LMK00105/LMK00804B

4.Input slew rate requirement

The datasheets recommends a (differential) input slew rate of ≥ 2 V/ns

Our clock buffer datasheet suggests approximately 1.08 V/ns slew rate. Would this single-ended input be expected to operate correctly with the LMK00101/LMK00105/LMK00804B?

Additionally, is the 2 V/ns figure a functional requirement for correct operation, or primarily a recommendation to achieve the specified additive jitter performance?  The aforementioned TI forum post alludes to this being a requirement?

In another TI forum post, I noticed someone being recommended to precede the clock fanout buffer with an LMK1C1102 LVCMOS Clock Buffer, to achieve  higher slew rates. Would that be a suggestion here?

5. Timing performance with single-ended 1.8 V sources

Do you have any characterisation data, application notes, or guidance regarding additive jitter performance when the LMK00101/LMK00105/LMK00804B are driven from a single-ended 1.8 V source rather than a differential source?

Our goal is to determine whether either device can be used directly with 1.8 V SE clock/sync sources while maintaining good timing performance, or whether level translation / a different configuration would be recommended.

Thank you for your help!

Robin

  • Hi Robin,

    Given that our clock sources are 1.8 V LVCMOS, does this mean that a 1.8 V clock is not guaranteed/supported on the LVCMOS_CLK input?

    Just as you said, rebiasing the signal allows for this device to receive an input as low as 1.2V.

    With a 1.8 V source, this presents a relatively heavy load (~18 mA sink current when the source drives LOW). Our clock buffer doesn't specify a max sink/source current.

    If you want to ensure a lower current draw, you could implement a bias network with larger resistors. 

    Presumably a 0 V to 1.8 V clock would be considered a valid single-ended input signal for the CLK/nCLK input pair?

    Correct.

    Additionally, is the 2 V/ns figure a functional requirement for correct operation, or primarily a recommendation to achieve the specified additive jitter performance?  The aforementioned TI forum post alludes to this being a requirement?

    This is primarily a recommendation to achieve optimal phase noise performance.

    In another TI forum post, I noticed someone being recommended to precede the clock fanout buffer with an LMK1C1102 LVCMOS Clock Buffer, to achieve  higher slew rates. Would that be a suggestion here?

    Yes.

    Do you have any characterisation data, application notes, or guidance regarding additive jitter performance when the LMK00101/LMK00105/LMK00804B are driven from a single-ended 1.8 V source rather than a differential source?

    Please see the phase noise curves in the application curves section of the datasheet. Those curves were measured with a single-ended input to the devices.

    Thanks,

    Michael