Hi expert.
I am drawing a schematic with dp83848.
Could you check if the Schematic is right?
I'm gonna use a am65xx processor and connect with RMII interface.
I attached schematic.
Really thanks.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi expert.
I am drawing a schematic with dp83848.
Could you check if the Schematic is right?
I'm gonna use a am65xx processor and connect with RMII interface.
I attached schematic.
Really thanks.
Hi GukHyun,
Thank you for contacting us. Please give me few days to go over the schematic in detail and provide you the feedback. I will respond to you by Monday (14th Feb).
--
Regards,
Gokul.
Hi GukHyun,
The schematic looks good except for a few things mentioned below.
Please let me know if you have any other queries.
--
Regards,
Gokul.
Thanks for your kind response!
I have question about number 3 of your reply.
I read some comment about phy address in datasheet 5.4.4 PHY Address
"Because the PHYAD[0] pin has weak internal pullup resistor and PHYAD[4:1] pins have weak internal pulldown resistors, the default setting for the PHY address is 00001 (0x01h)."
It says PHYAD[0] is pull up and the others are pull down internally . So I can guess that If I don't put any external pull up on PHYAD[0-4], it would be in state of phy address 1.
what do you think about it?
And you said RX_DV pin should be pulled up, but the datasheet doesn't say the pin is relative with phy address.
What about it?
Regards.
Really thanks
Hi GukHyun,
You are right about PHYADDR[0]. It should be fine even if no pull up is present on COL. I missed this.
As the intention is to use RMII mode, a pull up is needed on RX_DV.
--
Regards,
Gokul.
Hi GukHyun,
PFA, the schematic with annotated comments.
--
Regards,
Gokul.
Hi GukHyun,
Can you please let me know if there are any other queries. Else, please mark the query resolved.
--
Regards,
Gokul.