This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SN65DSI85-Q1: Can DSI85 support LVDS Multi point to point?

Part Number: SN65DSI85-Q1

Hi team,

As the title, can DSI85 support LVDS multi point to point? Thanks!

Jiawei

  • Hi team,

    Add one more question, just want to double check with you:

    When resolution is 1962*1566*60, RGB888, the DSI CLK is 553MHz. Is it within DSI85 range?

    Jiawei

  • Hi team,

    The multi point I say is like below, could you kindly support above questions? thanks!

    Jiawei

  • Jiawei

    DSI85 only supports point to point, it will not able to support multi point to point. 

    For LVDS CLK calculation, use the below formula

    So the DSI CLK frequency = 663.66MHz, which is outside of the DSI85 max DSI clock frequency of 500MHz. So the DSI85 will not able to support this resolution.

    Thanks

    David 

  • Hi David,

    Thanks for your reply! Sorry for the misunderstanding expression. Let me clarify here:

    • The display total frame size is 1566*1962*60 including active size and blanking, which is composed of two 783*1962 LVDS, more details pls see attached display datasheet.
      • From the LVDS CLK, single LVDS PCLK is around 92M, which is within the range of 154M.
      • From the DSI CLK, DSI84 calculation result is 553M, which is out of the range of 500M. So my question is that which method should I use to decide whether DSI84 can support 1566*1962*60 or not.
    • Like I said above, the display is composed of two 783*1962 LVDS, which has two driver IC. So could you kindly help check whether DSI84 or DSI85 can support below application? Customer feedback that they have driver the display successfully with DSI85 in below scenarios.
    • Another support need is that if we use DSI8x to driver the display with point to point, does that make sense? According to the datasheet, DSI8x channel A LVDS carries odd data, channel B carries even data.

    Thanks!

    Jiawei

  • Jiawei

    So the DSI CLK = 2 * 92 * 24 / 2 * 8 = 276MHz and it is within the DSI85 reference clock supported range. You will use Channel A and B to drive the two LVDS. 

    Refer to Table 7-4 in the DSI85 datasheet, Channel A can support Odd or Left pixel while Channel B can support Even or Right pixel.

    Thanks

    David

  • Hi David,

    From your reply, dsi8x selection is up to DSI CLK finally, right? I also want to check with you what is the meaning of 154M? Is 154M LVDS CLK single channel max or dual channel max pclk? From the selection e2e threat, DSI84 also supports the display from lvds pclk side, it is really confusing.

    Moreover, could you give more comments on channel a can support left while channel b can support right pixel? Does it mean dsi8x support the left application of above figure? Does it mean dsi8x support multi drop?

    Thanks and look forward you reply!

    Jiawei

  • Jiawei

    Since DSI84 is a single DSI channel (4 DSI lanes), then the DSI CLK calculation will be DSI CLK = 2 * 92 * 24 / 2 * 4 = 552MHz, outside the DSI CLK frequency range, so the DSI84 will not able to support this panel. 

    Can you share the panel spec? I don't see it being attached to this e2e thread.

    Thanks

    David

  • Jiawei

    So where did this diagram come from as I don't see it in the panel datahsheet.

    But the DSI85 can only point to point, it can't support multi drop connection.

    Thanks

    David

  • Hi David,

    A lot of customer said there are many high resolution display is multi drop structure, and they have used DSI8x driver display successfully. I also asked FPD-LINK BU, like 948 also said 948 support multi drop, but need to pay attention stubs length and PCLK range. 

    Can you explain why DSI8X can't support multi drop? Also because of the stub?

    Thanks!

    Jiawei

  • Jiawei

    The DSI8x LVDS output was not designed to support multi-drop LVDS implementation. You can possibly add buffer as a possible solution, but then you have to take the skew of the buffer into the system design consideration.

    Thanks

    David