This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TXS0102-Q1: follow up question on FAQ why TSX0xxx VIL/IH so stringent

Part Number: TXS0102-Q1

hello,

One follow up questions on why TXS010x VIL/VIH specification so stringent, i can understand the logic that the downstream device input requirement are taken into consideration. If we don't consider the Vol/voh dependency on Vil/Vih, what are the real VIL/VIH spec?

Regards,

Dongbao

  • For all input voltages below VCCA, the TXS works as an analog switch. For input voltages above VCCA, the switch is open, and the output voltage is determined by the pull-up resistor. It does not make sense to specify VIL/VIH values for this behaviour.

  • hi Clemens,

    Thanks for the feedback.

    Now I can understand why Vil doesn't make sense due to the N-FET on until input voltage higher enough to turn it off, but why VIH spec doesn't make sense?

  • Sorry, my statement might have been too strong. While there is no logic low state, it is possible to define the switch-open state as high.(And when you want to know what input voltage you need to make the output high, this is certainly the correct answer.)

  • Hi Dongbao,

    In addition to Clemens' feedback, note that with the direct input to output connection architecture of the device; the provided specification in the datasheet is to help guarantee specified VOL and VOH levels.

    Hence, if the VOL/VOH observed is acceptable; then there should be no concerns, as they are dependent on the current of the drivers per the application's IOL/IOH and ROH i.e VOL = VIL + (IOL*Ron) and VOH = Vcc - (IOH*ROH). Please see the referenced Factors Affecting VOL for the TXS and LSF Auto-Bidirectional Translational Devices, to help further clarify, thanks

     

    Best Regards,

    Michael.