This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMC567: LMC567 OPERATION WITH PULSE TRAIN AT INPUT

Part Number: LMC567
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM567C

I AM TRYING TO MAKE A 2 TONE DECODER IN AN APPLICATION USING LMC567

It is low frequency: but signal is a 3.3v  PULSE TRAIN out of a logic circuit.

The pulses   at  the input pin 3 of LMC567 have generally spectral content of 1200 Hz. I do not  have an input coupling capacitor. Amplitude of either component would be in my estimates approx. 1.4v rms

But in some cases, the main spectral content of the input would be 400 Hz.

So I configured the VCO to be at 400 Hz so that output level is high most of the cases.

It should go low when the input pulses have very strong spectral content of 400 Hz.

But I do not see that. Output state does not change. I know from spectrum at the input that I do indeed have 120 Hz  or 400 Hz.

I am suspecting that maybe the  chip is not suitable for operation with pulse inputs which will have  a broad range of frequencies.

Can I test the tone decoder operation by applying sinusoids by sweeping the signal over 400 Hz to 1220 Hz, say?

See pasted  schematic in a ppt slide.ti_lmc567sch.pptx

The issue right now is: will the IC operate  with these conditions of input signal  and values?

thnx

  • oops!
    typos in the post I just sent out regarding LMC567
    #1: I typed "120 HZ or 400Hz" of course should read " 1200 Hz or 400 Hz"
    #2 last line has " 400 Hz to 1220 Hz"....should read " 400 Hz to 1200 Hz" although here it does not lead a confusion due to the typo.
    apologize.
  • Hello Robin! No problem and thanks for your message! Ivan will take a look at this and get back to your soon. Thanks!
  • Ivan

    Jumping ahead,  while searching the web for any app specific information, it was a great pleasure to come across old old --Signetics part # & notes on this & that. Funny, how long this parts has been around....

    I conclude from the writings in various documents, that  the input has a bias level. This surely cannot be impacted by the input source.

    So I cannot hook up my previous stage which is an open collector opto output with a pull-up to 3.3V direct to the input pin of LMC567

    Now, TI has that info but there are other circuits that would make one believe you could do that. Fro example, in one oscillator, input  pin is grounded.

    From observations above, one surely cannot put ground potential at input pin,  wont you agree?

    I did have a dc coupling cap initially.

    So I have to select  a value consistent with the pull up value & the input impedance.

    To see 400 Hz thru, RC should give a HPF cut off at most 100 Hz

    So ReqCc> 10ms

    In my case, Req= 7.5K

    So,  Cc>1.33 uF........so we can use 2.2uF ( Tantalum will do; not X7R at these frequencies)

    Now I realize it was a small value(0.1uF)

    Would you agree that dc coupling of this sort is required?

    thx

    robin

  • Ivan

    So this morning, I changed the coupling cap 10x a large value consistent with  freq input I have.

    I applied a slow fm form an Agilent source.

    50 Ohms, my Spectrum analyzer is also 50 ohm

    That aside, at the chip input pin, I see NADA, zilch. DC level there is almost 0( as it should be, from my latest review of LM567 documents)

    So there IS something wrong.

    Searching the web, I came across some site giving calculations  spread sheet for LM567

    And this results in VERY DIFFERENT VALUES.

    See attached file.LM567_NEW_VALUES.pptx

    What is the real stuff here I can use to get the chip working as I indicated in the very first email text?

    thnx

  • Hi Robin,

    Sorry for the delayed response. I will take a look at this and will come back to you with detailed information tomorrow morning.

    Best regards,
    -Ivan Salazar
    Audio Applications Engineer - Low Power Audio & Actuators
  • Thnx Ivan

    Embarrassing to note that  a simple 1.1/(RC) causes so many arithmetic errors..

    The web calculator someone posted does not match with TI's revised equation f=1.1/(R1C1)

    If I select (as in the original)  R1=12400 Ohm

    C1=.221uF

    You get  f=403.22 Hz

    which is close enough

    The web calculator cannot be trusted

    In any event, the circuit does not seem to work with my original values and the original circuit with 1uF decoupling cap.

    Pl  check what is not quite right with the d/s equation... I will sweep the input & see where it locks & behaves as a "dual tone decoder"

    robin

  • Ivan
    I redid the simple math. & so now my values are
    R1=12.4k
    c1=.22uF
    It does not matter what I use. The major issue is that the input pin seems to be stuck at almost gnd potential. So there is no signal after the decoupling capacitor. I am going to try another assembly & see what it does.
    any insight into LMC567 operation will be highly appreciated.
  • ok, the latest now
    I have exact circuit values I emailed originally R1=12.4k, C1=.22uF, C2=6.8U, C3=2C2
    It turns out that the chip cannot take direct coupled signal. So I had damaged the first assembly.
    In the 2nd assembly, I do get signal at the chip input pin. I get pulses at pin 5, ramp at pin 6. Input is swept from 100 Hz to 2 kHz, sine of amplitude 1v
    I still get no output change of logic as the input passes through the VCO f=400 Hz.
    If I set the input fixed at the VCO freq, even then the output at pin8 wont change from hi to lo
    So this is the issue now.
    What am I doing wrong?
  • Ivan

    you still there?...

    at this time, I am stuck at 0

     Nowhere can I find any clue as to why the LMC567 wont respond as predicted by the d/s  notes.

    Any one else I can approach to explore what is missing from my design?

    appreciate

  • Robin,

    I apologize for the delayed response on your post.
    I would like to ask you a couple questions. What is the actual device you're using? LMC567 or LM567C? and what is the literature you're consulting SNOSBQ4E or SNOSBY1C?
    If you're using LMC567 you should set the oscillator center frequency to double of the input frequency to be sensed. Some information is available at Oscillator and Timing Components section of the data sheet.
    Input must be coupled with capacitor, no DC component should be present at the input pin.

    Best regards,
    -Ivan Salazar
    Audio Applications Engineer - Low Power Audio & Actuators
  • using LMC567
    Oh, I see! Did I miss this information in the d/s? Let me go & see if I can get it to work. I have to tell you that with f=400 Hz corresponding to values of R1 & C1, I did not see any response when my sweep was from 100 Hz to 1kHz. If there was a response of output going low at the freq LMC567 would react to the input freq, I would have noted & perhaps adjusted R1/C1. You know why there was response under the sweep? ...anything to do with BW being too narrow & the sweep did not hit any freq within the narrow range.
    thnx a lot
  • so, if the chip has f=1/(2.8RtCt), then in advertently, my circuit would have VCO=130 Hz & it would expect 65 Hz at the input to detect. I did run 1 sweep down to 10 Hz though!...may be then C2/C3 would be very large values so the time to change output would be very long. Thus sweep "time" would play a role. Anyways, you have given me enough to work with & figure out a way to make the circuit work.
  • Ivan
    VIKTORY at last.
    Yes, the circuit works.
    It was the sweep time that mattered. If 400 hz does not dwell long enough consistent C2/C3 values, it wont detect the input freq. That is #1 . Of course, the VCO had to be at the correct freq per 1/(2.8RtCt)...all others are wrong.
    thnx much.
  • Ivan

    Before I apply at the circuit real input signal, I need to clarify some confusing items in the d/s.

    My input is a fixed amplitude 3v pulses with PPM/PWM nature.. This will be capacitively coupled to the input of course.

    See attached item from d/s

    How do I interpret this input  absolute MIN  p-p to be "2V"?

    Yet, elsewhere, we have

    which means one can operate with as low as 10s of mV at input(rms)

    Then , further down

    Here, we see input can go all the up to Vcc( in my case it is 3.3v)

    There is a confusing statement about input frequency vs Fosc

    this should be typed as

    Fosc=2Finput

    Do you see this reversal of meaning in (7)?

    I need clarification about the max input voltage as soon as you can! I cannot damage any more assemblies....

    appreciate

    But we are almost there with a novel application of this chip.

    robin

  • wow : the screen shots went blank

    see attached pptdata_sheet_excerpts.pptx

  • Ivan
    no worries. I had to move on: given that max input seems to be pretty clearly VCC/2( pk-pk), I applied my real signal( PWM/PPM) & the circuit correctly responds as expected now.
    So consider the matter closed. It will be implemented with filter modifications only. Pretty cool idea.