This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
we are currently finalizing our hardware design. We have a question according to industrial Ethernet. We want to use EtherCAT on ICSSG0 (in future also Profinet and Ethernet/IP).
Due to resource conflicts MII0_RXER, MII0_RXLINK, MII1_RXER and MII1_RXLINK are currently not properly connected to MCU. On our current eval-board EtherCAT seemed to work, but we are unsure if this a valid design.
And from here one gets the impression cable redundancy will not work without these connections: software-dl.ti.com/.../EXAMPLES_INDUSTRIAL_COMMS_ETHERCAT_SLAVE_DEMOS.html
Can you clarify if we need those PHY pins properly connected to MCU?
Kind regards
Dominik
Due to resource conflicts MII0_RXER, MII0_RXLINK, MII1_RXER and MII1_RXLINK are currently not properly connected to MCU. On our current eval-board EtherCAT seemed to work, but we are unsure if this a valid design.
Hi Dominik,
For EtherCAT these pins are necessary to support features like Fast link up and Rx error detection.
And from here one gets the impression cable redundancy will not work without these connections: software-dl.ti.com/.../EXAMPLES_INDUSTRIAL_COMMS_ETHERCAT_SLAVE_DEMOS.html
Can you clarify if we need those PHY pins properly connected to MCU?
Yes its as the documentation states these pins are importatnt for EtherCAT. Ethernet IP and Profinet may still work