• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 126 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Original question:

MSPM0L1116: Why only mode-based current specs? Any per-peripheral current data?

MSPM0L1116: Clarification on timer additional current compared to RA0E2 values

Conor
Guru 14230 points

Part Number: MSPM0L1116

Hi,

In this thread I understand that MSPM0L1116 does not provide per-peripheral current specs, and it was suggested that enabling a timer in STANDBY mode does not significantly increase current:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/microcontrollers/arm-based-microcontrollers-group/arm-based-microcontrollers/f/arm-based-microcontrollers-forum/1620359/mspm0l1116-why-only-mode-based-current-specs-any-per-peripheral-current-data

For comparison, Renesas RA0E2 lists interval timer additional current of about 0.06 µA (typ).

From your experience with MSPM0:

  • When a timer is enabled in STANDBY, would the additional current be in the same sub-µA range as RA0E2?

  • Or would it typically be lower / higher than that level?

We understand this may not be an official spec, but even a qualitative engineering perspective would be helpful.

Thanks,

Conor