There seems to be a site error currently. If I browse to the overview
then click on the TM4C12x link I get the following
Various paths end up with variation on 404 pages.
Robert
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
There seems to be a site error currently. If I browse to the overview
then click on the TM4C12x link I get the following
Various paths end up with variation on 404 pages.
Robert
Huh... some internet voodoo is going on...
I had a number of friends check with various combos of Chrome, Firefox, and IE, including a couple who are not in the office and thus not on the TI network but their own WiFi's... everyone so far as has 82 parts show up.
To say I am stumped would be an understatement.
Can you please submit Website Feedback via our feedback form? That's the only thing I can think of at this point to at least bring some attention to it and see if you stumbled into some weird isolated case: https://www.ti.com/secext/docs/webform/webform.tsp
Humm... Were you logged in when clicking the link?
I got it from this site (over/under on this link working for you?): which I reached by going to Support & Training (main menu bar) -> Feedback -> "Report a website issue".
Hello Robert,
Thanks for pointing these out. Going through the product search a bit, I see a lot of issues with it. Like also no search for USB, or some of the more specialized TM4C129x modules. Furthermore, there are searches for items like FRAM and I2C which don't apply for any processor in the tree.
Looks like there is a lot of work to be done on the new search options...
cb1_mobile said:My point then - some "Improved Method" - for "Probing, Examining and DETECTING such issues" is required.
It would appear so.
Non-engineers checking an Engineers selection tool. how could that possibly go wrong. Mind you getting engineers to perform this might be a bit of a chore as well.
cb1_mobile said:You may rely upon poster Robert "Some of the time" - but NOT, "All of the time!"
That I was using it at that point was sheer fortune. Although if it had stayed then at some point someone would have pointed it out. perhaps after many had been chased away. Despite its flaws Digikey's selection tool still ranks in the top spot.
And despite the complaints TI's is still better than some. I was performing a similar exercise on NI's site. As near as I could tell they have no parametric search.
Robert
What complaints? Presentation of "facts & just the facts" (i.e. the obvious need for better (i.e. "some") FLAW DETECTION METHODS (beyond skilled user/specifiers) should be (properly) seen as, "Valued Guidance & User Feedback."
cb1_mobile said:What complaints? Presentation of "facts & just the facts" (i.e. the obvious need for better (i.e. "some") FLAW DETECTION METHODS (beyond skilled user/specifiers) should be (properly) seen as, "Valued Guidance & User Feedback."
Robert Adsett said:How is such presentation not a complaint?
Is it not "fair/proper" to have the "Merriam Webster" dictionary referee?
Complaint: noun, 1) an utterance of pain, displeasure etc. 2) a cause for complaining, 3) an ailment, 4) Law - a formal charge.
Thus - as sound was off/muted - NO utterances resulted; "No cause" rather a prescription for fixing; No ailment; and No charges! (court-house service required).
Presentation: noun, 1) a presenting or being presented; 2) something presented, as a theatrical performance, a gift etc.
Strong case may be made that (some) Non-Outsider, Flaw Detection Method WAS "presented." (without pain, displeasure - or (even) ailment!) (I did swear when the mouse fell - landing on my toe!)
Beyond the "law of language" - complaints usually employ a "whine" tone. No such "whine" appeared! Instead - it was (properly) advised that, "Vendor should better - (i.e. somewhat) "Self-Monitor!" In all fairness - such stands as "Valuable Guidance - and Feedback" ... far from "complaint."
Thanks for this, Ralph. It is "hoped" - that there are (No more) "complaints" from Robert!
cb1_mobile said:Robert AdsettHow is such presentation not a complaint?Is it not "fair/proper" to have the "Merriam Webster" dictionary referee?Complaint: noun, 1) an utterance of pain, displeasure etc. 2) a cause for complaining, 3) an ailment, 4) Law - a formal charge.
Definitions 1 and 2 do appear to fit my complaints.
cb1_mobile said:Beyond the "law of language" - complaints usually employ a "whine" tone. No such "whine" appeared!
And here we do get into dialect.
Robert
And via Chrome - w/in Chicago - we note "just the same (new) view" as does Robert. We must hope that (change) arrives tomorrow...