• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 82 subscribers
  • Views 1219 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

deadband in the HVPM Sensorless example

Brad Mularcik
Intellectual 580 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CONTROLSUITE

I am working with the HVPM Sensorless example for the 28335.  I am using my own inverter hardware instead of the HV Kit.  My inverter bridge is getting hot.  I looked at the gate drive signals on the o-scope and it does not look like there is any deadband between the high and low side drive signals.  Is there a place in the code to est this, or does the HV kit hardware take care of that?

Thanks,

Brad Mularcik

  • 0
    TI__Guru** 118750 points

    deadband is implemented in the PWM driver

    C:\ti\controlSUITE\libs\app_libs\motor_control\drivers\f2803x_v1.1\f2803xpwm.h

    #define DBCTL_INIT_STATE  (BP_ENABLE + POLSEL_ACTIVE_HI_CMP)

    #define DBCNT_INIT_STATE   100   // 100 counts = 1.66 usec (delay) * 100 count/usec (for TBCLK = SYSCLK/1)

     

    You aren't seeing any DB between A and B outputs?

  • 0 in reply to ChrisClearman
    Intellectual 580 points

    Chris,

    Upon closer inspection, I can see that there is a deadband.  My issue apears to be a logic inversion in the high side drive of the recycled inverter circuit that I am using.    Thank goodness for current limiting power supplies!

    Thanks for the help.

    Brad Mularcik