This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TIDM-02002: Power Losses in the C3M0030090K SiC MOSFET

Part Number: TIDM-02002
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDM-02008

Good day, I hope you are fine and healthy.

I need to know the Power Losses in the C3M0030090K SiC MOSFET
used for the Full-Bridge Primary & Secondary sides on [TIDM-02002] DC-DC converter

I'm using [TIDM-02008] as the PFC Stage 380-V DC Output @ 3.3-kW.

My Inquiry:
1- Power Losses in the C3M0030090K SiC MOSFET for the Primary & Secondary respectively.


2- Is it possible to use the

C3M0065100K (N-Channel, 1000V, 35A, Rds On (65 mOhm), 113.5W )  instead of 

C3M0030090K (N-Channel, 900V, 63A ,Rds On (30 mOhm) , 149W)?

If that possible, what will be the Power Losses in the C3M0065100K SiC MOSFET? 

Thanks in advance
Best Regards,
Abdalla Saad

  • Abdalla, 

    Let me connect this thread to Wolfspeed team for best recommendation on their part for these topologies. As I am not an expert in SiC.

    As CLLLC is completely soft switching on this design our estimate was as below, purely on conduction losses/  

    V2 = 300V                    →   Ipri= 22 Amps RMS → Pcond = 22^2 * 0.065 = 31.46 , At a given time 2 switches are conducting

    hence Pcond_sec_total= 31.46*2 = 62.92

    Hence total losses on all switches: 87.498 W

    -Manish

  • Hi Abdalla,

    I am part of the Wolfspeed team.  Thank you for the question and considering our SiC MOSFETs for your design.  I wanted to let you know that I am looking into your question and I will get back to you with a more detailed answer in the next day or two.  In the mean time, have you looked at our SpeedFit design simulator (https://www.wolfspeed.com/speedfit) ?  It can help you quickly assess different topologies, devices, and cooling requirements early in a design.  

    Thanks for your patience.

    -Adam

  • Manish,

    Thanks for your response.

    To get clearly
    For these parameters
    VSEC = 300 V
    Ipri= 6.6KW / 300V =22 Amps RMS
    we get
    conduction losses for
    Secondary:
    Pcond_sec_total = 31.46*2 = 62.92 W
    Total :
    Total losses on all switches = 87.498 W


    how you calculated the Pcond_prim_total to be =24.578 W?
    Note that VPRIM =380 V @ 3.3-kW [TIDM-02008]
    if the output power reduced to =3.3kw for the on [TIDM-02002] DC-DC converter

    According to the Test Results (Design Guide: TIDM-02002, 3.2.3 @ Page 71)

    VPRIM =378.08 V
    VSEC =280.06 V
    Pout = 3304.4 W

    conduction losses  
    VSEC = 280.06 V
    Ipri= 3304.4W / 280.06V =11.79 Amps RMS
    Pcond = 11.79^2 * 0.065 = 9.03W
    Pcond_sec_total = 9.03*2 = 18.07 W

    (please advise if I misunderstanding)


    thanks in advance
    Abdalla,

  • Hi Abdalla,

    Thanks again for your patience.  I used the SpeedFit simulator (https://www.wolfspeed.com/speedfit) to analyze your design.  This tool allows for quick comparisons between alternate parts like you are looking for.  

    Based on your operating point (380V in, 280V 3.3kW out, 500kHz Fres) the alternate part you are considering should still work depending on the thermal design of your system (Rcs, Rsa, and Tambient).  It does have higher conduction losses than the original part due to the higher Rdson.    The file below shows the SpeedFit comparison between the 30mOhm 900V part and the 65mOhm 1000V part you asked about.  

    /cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/171/3.3kW-CLLC-SpeedFit.pdf

    If your application does not require more than 400V, you could also consider a 650V part such as C3M0060065K (60mOhm 650V).  This part will provide improved efficiency due to the lower voltage rating.  The file below shows the SpeedFit comparison between the 30mOhm 900V part and this part.  

    /cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/171/3.3kW-CLLC-SpeedFit-650V-part.pdf

    Please let me know if you have any additional questions.  

  • Hi Adam,
    Thanks for your response

    Can I know the thermal parameters (Rcs, Rsa, and Tambient) that you used to get these results?

    If I use two [TIDM-02008] in parallel to get 380V@6.6kW
    For these new operating point (380V in, 280V 6.6kW out, 500kHz Fres)
    Rth,ch = 3.73 °C/W
    Rth,ha =1.2 °C/W

    what is the suitable alternate part you advise?

    C3M0030090K
    C3M0060065K
    C3M0065100K

    Wish you a Nice Day.
    Best Regards,
    Abdalla Saad

  • Hi Abdalla,

    I used a 50C fixed baseplate temperature and 0.5C/W RCH, which would correspond to a high-performing grease.  Admittedly this represents a very aggressive cooling system, but for the sake of relative comparison between parts is sufficient.  Using the numbers that you provided, it looks like your best option may be to parallel 2 parts.  May I ask what you are using for the case-to-heatsink interface, the thermal impedance of that joint seems high even for an isolated pad.  

    Thanks,

    Adam

  • Hi Adam,
    Thanks for your response

    For the heat sink:
    A 30-mm×30-mm×25-mm push-pin heat sink Part number [UBM30-25BP-1P08] from Alpha Company Ltd at 600-LFM Forced Air Cooling.
    The Heat Sink thermal resistance is (Rθhs) approximately 1.2°C/W

    For the TIM:
    GR-45A Gap filling pad Part number [ GR-45A-E0-100-BL- 30x30 mm] from Fujipoly with PET film on one surface to facilitate Electric Isolation, with this Tim along with the push-pin heat sink.
    The TIM thermal resistance is (RθTIM) approximately 3.2°C/W

    May I ask for your e-mail for further support?
    Best Regards,
    Abdalla Saad

  • Abdalla,

    You can take the conversation offline with Adam as needed, i will not recommend posting direct email ID In the thread here.

    As the question is resolved i will close this thread.

    -Manish 

  • Manish,

    Ok, I'm understanding.
    I'm waiting for Adam's Feedback.

    Thank you for understanding
    Wish you a Nice Day.
    Best Regards,
    Abdalla Saad