This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
I am trying to lower current consumption in LPM4.5. I am using SBW so I pulled-up the RST pin with a 47k resistor as described in SLAU278AH, Figure 2-3. Then I discovered that the internal pull-up resistor is enabled by default (SYSRSTRE = 1 by default as specified in Family UG). My questions are:
1) SYSRSTRE shall be explicity cleared before entering LPM4.5 to minimize current consumption?
2) Is the internal pull-up assumed enabled (without external 47k) or disabled (with external 47k) when computing the 16nA value stated in FR2433 D/S, Table 6-1?
The NOTE to the FR2433 D/S, Table 6-1, states: 'XT1CLK and VLOCLK can be active during LPM4 if requested by low-frequency peripherals, such as RTC or WDT.'. My further question is:
3) Is this also valid for LPM4.5 or may I assume that, in LPM4.5, XT1CLK and VLOCLK are always shut-down (and generate no additional current consumption) and no peripheral can keep them alive?
Many thanks in advance,
Mauro
Hi Mauro,
1) SYSRSTRE shall be explicity cleared before entering LPM4.5 to minimize current consumption?
When there is a external pull-up resistor, internal pull-up resistor could be disabled.
Meanwhile, in SHUTDOWN mode, The register content of all modules and the CPU is lost, which means the SYSRSTRE lost its status. So, I assume it will have no effect. Can you have a try and see whether it will have some difference.
2) Is the internal pull-up assumed enabled (without external 47k) or disabled (with external 47k) when computing the 16nA value stated in FR2433 D/S, Table 6-1?
I assume it is with a external pull-up resistor. the 16nA value may not contain the leakage current.
I will ask releant experts about this, and give you the feedback.
3) Is this also valid for LPM4.5
No, LPM4.5 doesn't support it.
B.R.
Sal
Hi Sal,
many thanks for your reply.
while in LPM4.5 I measure the following voltages across the 47k resistor between RST and Vcc (3.3V):
In both cases V(RST) > Vcc, so the MSP-FET is driving RST with a voltage greater than Vcc that seems quite strange.
Wether these voltages are expected, I suppose that the currents associated to them are to be considered as 'external currents' in D/S par. 5.8 ('Low-Power Mode LPMx.5 Supply Currents (Into VCC) Excluding External Current') otherwise there could be a failure in my MSP-FET or a wrong setting that should be investigated.
B.R.
Mauro
**Attention** This is a public forum