This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS7A24: "Output capacitor" and "Input capacitor" described in "6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions" of the TPS7A24 data sheet

Part Number: TPS7A24

Are the "Output capacitor" and "Input capacitor" described in "6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions" of the TPS7A24 data sheet "nominal capacitor value"?
Or is it "effective capacitance"?

  • Hello,

    The capacitance is the effective capacitance in the EC table.

    Thanks,

    Stephen

  • thank you for your answer.
    I have an additional question.

    If "MAX100uF" of "Output capacitor" of "6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions" is "effective capacitance",
    Is it inconsistent with "The effective output capacitance value is recommended to not exceed 50 μF." In "8.1.3 Input and Output Capacitor Requirements"?

    "50 μF" in "The effective output capacitance value is recommended to not exceed 50 μF." Is not the value that "MAX100uF" in "Output capacitor" in "6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions" is reduced by 50% due to derating. Is it?

  • Hello,

    The device is specified to remain stable when Cout = 1uF to 100uF.  I confirmed that this interpretation is correct, as validation of the device was completed with both 1uF and 100uF output capacitors.  I believe it is recommended to stay below 50uF due to derating, as you have mentioned.  We assume the effective capacitance = 50% * nominal capacitance.  So 50% * 100uF = 50uF.

    Thanks,

    Stephen

  • Thank you polite reply.

    Let me sort out the conclusions.

    In conclusion, is the following interpretation correct?

    ・ "Output capacitor = MIN: 1uF to MAX: 100uF" in "6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions" is "nominal capacitor value".

    ・Assuming "the effective capacitance = 50% * nominal capacitor value".

    Sorry for the same content as the previous question.
    Just in case, let me make sure that the interpretation is correct.

  • Yes this is correct.

    Thanks,

    Stephen