Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ20Z45
Hi all,
We are also experiencing some communication issues in some battery packs that use the bq40z50-R4. Below, you can find some examples in which reading the battery parameters through SMBus seems not to be reliable (all from the same test).
1. Relative SoC “jumps”: this is a common issue that we saw in another fuel gauge IC as well (bq20z45). In some cases, when reading the relative SoC parameter of the battery (dll_rel_soc), there are some “jumps”.
2. Charging voltage “jumps”: we also saw the same issue in the charging voltage parameter (dll_chg_u). This won’t be dangerous for the performance of the batteries, but it’s another symptom that the i2C communication could be failing.
3. Lots of values missing at some point: during the previous case, in which the charging voltage dropped to 0 apparently, many other parameters went down as well. The acquisition time is 5min, so as you can see there were probably 10-15min. in which the communication with the i2C failed for some kind of reason. This happened at 25ºC (inside a climatic chamber) and at the beginning of a charging process, which is quite uncommon in my opinion.
Could this issue be related to the fuel gauge IC? As I saw, other people were having similar issues. Maybe could it be due to the clock stretching between the fuel gauge from TI and our SMBus reader?
Thank you for your time and I'm looking for someone's answer
Best regards,
Juan