Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS546D24
Hello,
My customer requested TI's review of the TPS546D24ARVF design.
Please review their design below to see if there are any problems.
Thank you.
JH
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
My customer requested TI's review of the TPS546D24ARVF design.
Please review their design below to see if there are any problems.
Thank you.
JH
Hi JH,
Could you please complete the Excel spreadsheet (link below)? This will help us streamline the review process and allow us to provide a more thorough review.
https://www.ti.com/tool/download/SLURB01
Thank you,
Tomoya
Hi Tomoya,
Thanks for your help.
Below is the Excel file you requested and the circuit diagram modified by the customer. Please review it.
They has additional questions.
Q1. The customer's first circuit was created by referring to TI Webench. Why are the references, such as recommended settings, different for Webench and Excel file?
Q2. Which reference should the user prioritize?
Q3. When using the above design, is it possible to only monitor the status through PMBUS after normal operation without control through PMBUS?
Regards,
JH
Hi JH,
I found a few critical errors in the schematic.

Q1. The customer's first circuit was created by referring to TI Webench. Why are the references, such as recommended settings, different for Webench and Excel file?
TI Webench is an excellent place to start. It provides additional information our Excel tool does not offer, such as efficiency, component part numbers, etc.
However, when reviewing schematics, the Excel tool is better because it has a schematic and layout checklist, and you can quickly enter the values and check the result. I expect the difference between Webench and Excel to be small, but if there is a big difference, we need to look at it on a case-by-case basis.
Q2. Which reference should the user prioritize?
Both tools are great, whichever customer feels comfortable with, but I recommend using Excel to review the final design.
Q3. When using the above design, is it possible to only monitor the status through PMBUS after normal operation without control through PMBUS?
Regards,
Yes, the device should be able to power up without PMBus control, and the PMBus can just be used for status monitoring.