Tool/software:
XENO-Thionyl Chloride Lithium XL-145F
8500mAh
3.6V nominal, 2.0V cutoff
XENO-Thionyl Chloride Lithium XL-205F
19000mAh, 3.6V nominal, 2.0V cutoff
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Tool/software:
XENO-Thionyl Chloride Lithium XL-145F
8500mAh
3.6V nominal, 2.0V cutoff
XENO-Thionyl Chloride Lithium XL-205F
19000mAh, 3.6V nominal, 2.0V cutoff
Hello Craig,
If you need a ChemID for the battery, you can send it to our labs. However, for Li-SOCl2 batteries, you can configure the gauge for End of Service mode using the Application notes below.
How to Configure the BQ35100 for EOS Mode (ti.com)
Using EoS mode, you do not need to have a ChemID programmed.
Regards,
Siddharth
Here: This post seems to imply the chem_id is NOT needed in accumulator mode.
https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/849933/bq35100-bq35100-battery-characterization
which is referenced in this post:
e2e.ti.com/.../4977569
Can you guys make this clearer in the documentation?
Seems like Accumulator mode is the most accurate assuming you know your off-state current draw?
1)Accumulator mode DOES NOT need CHEMID?
2)The EOS Mode DOES NOT need CHEM_ID, but it still needs to be trained/learn?
3)Accumulator mode is more accurate for SOC, EOS mode is better for detecting EOS (SOC not very accurate while the resistance is flat)?
Hello Craig,
The best mode will depend on what chemistry of battery you are using. If you are using a Lithium Thionyl Chloride battery, then the best mode is the EOS mode. The best mode for lithium manganese dioxide is SOH mode.
1. Accumulator does not need ChemID.
2. EOS mode does not need ChemID. The battery needs to be learned so the correct trend detection value can be used for the application.
3. Yes accumulator mode is more accurate for SOC. When using EOS mode, the SOC value is not accurate and should be disregarded.
Regards,
Nick Richards