• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Answers 3 answers
  • Subscribers 63 subscribers
  • Views 52 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

LM5148-Q1: Solar - PV optimizer Design & Development -Power Topology Selection

Nitesh Modi
Prodigy 10 points
Part Number: LM5148-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5175, LM5176

Tool/software:

Hi there,

Currently I am working on development of MPPT based PV optimizer for solar power optimisation,

The Power level of Power optimizer is 700Wp [Voc= 52V, ISC = 15.5A.( Vmpp = 50V, Impp=14A)] Which power topology is more suitable in non-isolated topology area?

With lot of literature study, I have come across buck, buck-boost, cuk.  

Which is the best suitable power topology, that I should prefer as far as the solar domain concerns.

In in case of buck-boost (which one to select buck-boost or cuk)?

Thanks in Advance!!!

  

  • 0
    TI__Guru 52122 points

    Hi Nitesh,

    What is the required output voltage? And what is the Vin range (as Vmpp will vary with irradiance, temperature, etc.)? This determines whether you need a buck or a buck-boost solution.

    For a buck-boost regulator at 700W, take a look at the LM5175/6/7 family.

    Regards,

    Tim

  • 0
    Prodigy 10 points

    Hello Tim,

    The range of Vmpp is 20V-50V. And output voltage is  in range of 20V-63V.

    At for 700W power rating which topology is more efficient bock-boost or cuk in terms of performce, cost, efficiency ?

  • 0 in reply to Nitesh Modi
    TI__Guru 52122 points

    Nitesh,

    Take a look at the 4-switch non-inverting buck boost - LM5175, LM5176, etc. This is the recommended circuit at this power level.

    Note that conventional buck-boost and Cuk designs are inverting, producing a negative output voltage. The SEPIC and 2-switch buck-boost are non-inverting but suitable at lower powers.

    Regards,

    Tim

  • 0
    Prodigy 10 points

    Tim,

    Non inverting is not a concern for me.even thogh if Asic is also not a concern for me. I can go with digital control as well. Now tell me which is most suitable cuk or conventional buck-boost. Though cuk has more comments compare to buck boost. Cuk will be costly solution compare to buck boost. What about efficiency at 700w power level.just to add one more point size is not a big constraint .now Which is best?

  • 0 in reply to Nitesh Modi
    TI__Guru 52122 points

    Neither of those is suitable for 700W. Go with the 4-switch buck-boost regulator.