This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM1085: Do you have any graph of ESR range for LM1085 like Figure 16 in AN-1148 application report?

Part Number: LM1085

 Hello guys,

 One of my customers is going to use LM1085 for their new products.

 At this time, they have the following questions. Could you please give my you reply?

 Q1. Does TI have any graph of ESR  range for LM1085 like Figure 16 in AN-1148 application report?

        AN-1148

        http://www.ti.com/lit/an/snva020b/snva020b.pdf

 Q2. Does TI have any graph of ESR range for LM1085 in 10uF, 22uF, 33uF case?

        If TI doesn't have, could you please tell me how to calcurate ESR for each capacitance case?

 Your reply would be much appreciated.

 Best regards,

 Kazuya.

  • Hi Kazuya,

    We don't have ESR plots for this device like Figure 16 in AN-1148 application report.
    Please review the following E2E post, which is very similar to your question.

    https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management/f/196/t/895870

    If after review of this post, you still need assistance, please reply and let me know.

    Thanks,

    - Stephen

  •  Hi Stephan,

     Thank you very much for your reply.

     The customer checked LM1085IS-3.3 output waveform on their own PCB with several POSCAP as the below.

                 Cout(uF)    ESR(mohm)    Fzero(kHz)

                                   (@500kHz)     (Fzero=1/(2pi*Cout*ESR))

    CAP1:  47              41                    82.6

    CAP2:  33              53.3                 90.5

    CAP3:  22              44.1                 164

    CAP4:  10              48                    331.6

    CAP5:   5.6            66.5                 427.4

     As the result, CAP1 case was most stable output voltage and CAP5 was most unstable.

    ( Output waveform stable CAP1 > CAP2 > CAP3 > CAP4 > CAP5 unstable)

     In case of CAP5, the output voltage was oscilated with 100kHz and 70mVp-p at light load.

     In case of CAP1, the output voltage was stabled at the light load.

     The customer though CAP5 case is most stable because the E2E post you wrote said Fzero should be set to 500kHz for LM1085.

     But the customer experiment result showed CAP1 is the best for output voltage stability and CAP5 is the worst.

     My questions are...

    1. Is 500kHz for LM1085 Fzero correct? May lower frequency than 500kHz be actual Fzero?

    2. If 500kHz is not correct, what is the actual Fzero. Which frequency is recommended for LM1085 Fzero?

     Could you please give me your reply?

     Thank you again and best regards,

     Kazuya. 

      

  • Hi Kazuya,

    Thank you for the detailed information and post.
    I need some additional information before I can fully reply to the customers concerns.

    Was the test at room temperature?
    Can the customer provide the specific manufacturing part numbers of each capacitor, as well as their output voltage?

    If so, we can do a review of the capacitance including bias effects, which will change the actual capacitor value.

    Can the customer provide an oscilloscope plot showing the condition where the linear regulator was unstable (Cap 5 with 100kHz frequency oscillation)?
    What load is considered light load to the customer?

    Thanks,

    - Stephen

  •  Hi Stephen,

     Thank you very much for the pronmpt reply.

     >Was the test at room temperature?
    >Can the customer provide the specific manufacturing part numbers of each capacitor, as well as their output voltage?

     Yes. The test was at room temperature and each capacitor part number is the follow.

    CAP1: Panasonic 10TPB47M

    CAP2: Panasonic 10TPB33M

    CAP3: Panasonic 8TPC22M

    CAP4: Panasonic 8TPC22M

    CAP5: Panasonic 25TQC5R6M

    >Can the customer provide an oscilloscope plot showing the condition where the linear regulator was unstable (Cap 5 with 100kHz frequency oscillation)?
    >What load is considered light load to the customer?

     The customer don't want to disclosed the waveform they took to E2E.

     If it is no problem, could you please tell me your e-mail address?

     Thank you again and best regards,

     Kazuya.

  • Hi Kazuya,

    I have sent you an E2E friendship request.
    If you accept the request you can send me the data directly.

    Thanks,

    - Stephen

  •  Hi Stephen,

     Thank you for your the friendship request.

     I accepted it and sent you a private message.

     Could you please review the message?

     Thank you again and best regards,

     Kazuya.

  • Hi Kazuya,

    I reviewed the capacitors.  They are all tantalum polymer capacitors so no bias effect will be seen.

    I have your waveforms and the results by the customer are interesting.
    I need to investigate this on our end to try and replicate the results.
    I will reply back within 2 business days with an update.
    If we have components in our lab, I should have some test data collected.
    If not, it will take up to 5 business days for shipping to send the components to our lab, then another 1-2 business days to collect the data.

    Thanks,

    - Stephen

  •  Hi Stephen,

     Thank you very much for your reply and your cooperation.

     I see.

     I'm looking forward to receive your experiment result.

     Thank you again and best regards,

     Kazuya.

  • Hi Kazuya,

    I have provided some feedback through a private message.
    Please review and reply when you can.

    Thanks,

    - Stephen

  •  Hi Stephen,

     Thank you for your reply.

     I replied you through a private message.

     Could you please check it?

     Thank you again and best regards,

     Kazuya.

  • This thread was taken off line.
    The oscillations were replicated on the bench but only when the minimum load was not being met for stability.
    Once the minimum load requirement was met, the oscillations stopped and the linear regulator was very stable.

    - Stephen