This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS56637: adjustable output voltage regulation via the LM61460 or TPS56637?

Part Number: TPS56637
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM61460

Hi all -

I am trying to build a buck regulator circuit that can handle Vin = 6.2V to 28V input and, after tweaking the feedback resistors (with digital pots) and restarting the Vreg*, putting out a regulated voltage in the range of Vout = 3.3V to min(12V, c*Vin), at up to 6A, where c will likely be in the range of 0.8 to 0.9.  I am looking at using either the LM61460 or a TPS56637 to accomplish this. Though I'll be changing the feedback resistors (when the voltage regulator is off) with this approach, I'm likely stuck using set values for the passives elsewhere in the circuit (specifically, for the L and C of the low-pass filter on the regulated output).  

Thus, my questions: do stability considerations render either the LM61460 or the TPS56637 (or, another chip?) better suited for this challenge?  Which corner case should use when selecting the L and C when designing this circuit on WEBENCH?

Thanks for the help,

Tom

*Note: specific care will be taken in the software driving the digital pot in order to cycle the power to the switching regulator offcompletely before adjusting the value of the resistance of the digital pot (leveraging a look-up table, which may be recalibrated on the fly) in order to, whenever the value of the digital pot is changed, both (a) reset the (internal) compensation coefficient of the switching regulator IC, and (b) prevent Over Voltage Protection (OVP) from kicking in and triggering a soft restart of the switching regulator IC.

  • Hi Tom,

    For TPS56637, the highest Vout is 13V. Is it suitable?

    Thanks,

    Lishuang

  • Yes, the output I'm looking for is from 3.3V to a maximum of 12V, with the upper limit reduced to about 10%-20% less than Vin if Vin<13V (so that I may use a buck regulator instead of a buck/boost regulator).

    What I'm worried about is stability issues for such a wide range of inputs and outputs.  I'm not quite sure I know how to determine that I'm ok on the stability question for a particular circuit implementation (with a particular fixed L and Cout) over this entire range of Vin and Vout.  But the values I'm considering are well within where this ICs can handle, if given (fiexed) values of L and Cout can be found to provide stability over the entire range?

  • Hi Tom,

    Got it. I will try to test in our lab. And give you response by the end of Thursday.

    Thanks,

    Lishuang

  • Thank you so much Lishuang!  I look forward to your feedback.  If it helps, the designs that have come out of WEBENCH for me so far may be summarized as shown below; the TPS56637 has the lowest range of Cout recommended for the three different values of Vout attempted, whereas the LM61460 has the lowest range of L recommended.  But I suppose it is their product that really matters for stability.  Is one set of {L, Cout} for either device going to give stability for Vout from 3.3V all the way to 12V?  Note also that the case with 12V out on the LM61460 only occasionally comes up on WEBENCH - I don't know if this is simply a glitch in the WEBENCH software, or indicative of a possible stability issue with this range that isn't always flagged?

    TPS56637

    6.21V-28V in, 3.3V out

    L=2.2uH

    Cout=30uF

    TPS56637

    6.21V-28V in, 5V out

    L=3.3uH

    Cout=47uF

    TPS56637

    14.7V-28V in, 12V out

    L=5.6uH

    Cout=30uF

    LM61460

    6.1V-28V in, 3.3V out

    L=3.3uH

    Cout=141uF (!)

    LM61460

    6.1V-28V in, 5V out

    L=4.7uH

    Cout=100uF

    LM61460

    13.2V-28V in, 12V out

    L=5.6uH

    Cout=20uF

    stable??

    Doesn’t always come up on WEBENCH

  • Hi Tom,

    I have tested in lab. For 6-28Vin, you can use L=5.6uH and Cout=3*22uF (1206 package, 25VDC) to cover Vout from 3.3V to 12V. All the conditions are stable, but the bandwidth can be only up to 40KHz-50KHz which will lead to slow response of transient. And please make sure that Vout change should be under the regulator off.

    And I am not familiar with LM61460, you can submit a thread only related to LM61460, then dedicated engineer will support you.

    Thanks,

    Lishuang