This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

AM6548: General question about DDR

Part Number: AM6548


Tool/software:

Hi, 

Would it be acceptable to use x16 width device for the DDR but with an x8 device ECC?

Or do they all need to be the same device / same width?

Thank you.

  • Greetings,

    Please refer to the DDR layout and design guidelines. They must all be the same device and the guidelines show how it should be connected.

    https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spraci2 

    Sincerely,

    Lucas

  • Hi Lucas, 

    I was looking at the guidelines and had a follow-up question.

    For the unused bit (DQ7) in the ECC, is it preferable to pull it up or down? 

    The design guidelines show DQ7 being pulled low on a x16 device in Figure 1:

    However, this is not shown at all in Figure 2 for a x8 device:

    (I believe this is a typo, as it maps DDR_ECC_D[6:0] to the ECC's DQ[7:0])

    Further, the schematics for the AM65 EVM (which uses x8) shows the DQ7 being pulled high.

    Is there a reason why the ECC's DQ7 is pulled low in x16 but high in x8? Please advise.

    Thank you!

  • Greetings Michael,

    The unused pins on the DRAM itself may have requirements/recommendations from the memory vendor for what to do with unused pins, but I do not believe they should not have an effect on the ECC functionality. If there are none it may also have been done to simplify the board layout, I will ask the team about this. Please note that we have our usual experts out on timebank for an extended period of time and will have a delayed response to this specific question.

    Unused pins on the SoC have their guidelines in this document for what to do with them depending on DDR4/DDR3/LPDDR4.

    Sincerely,

    Lucas