This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TDA4AL-Q1: LUT File Format for PWL Curve: Should Values End With Comma?

Part Number: TDA4AL-Q1

Tool/software:

Hi TI expert,

As stated in the title, when I use the DCC tool to generate the PWL curve settings, the output values in the LUT file have a comma after each number (for example: 12345,).

https://git.ti.com/cgit/processor-sdk/imaging/tree/sensor_drv/src/imx728/dcc_xmls/wdr/lut_rawfe_pwl_vshort.txt?h=main

However, when I use the Python script from
https://git.ti.com/cgit/processor-sdk/imaging/tree/tools/default_DCC_profile_gen/scripts/dccxml_decompand.py?h=main
to generate the LUT, the values do not have a comma after the number (for example: 12345).

Could you please help clarify which format is correct or preferred for the ISP/DCC system?
Should the LUT values have a comma after each number, or not?

Thank you very much for your help!

Best regards,
YL