This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

PHYSYNC and RADSYNC on TMS320TCI6614

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320TCI6614

Hi,

I'm currently working in a design using the TMS320TCI6614 and am seeking to know if my understanding of the use of the PHYSYNC and RADSYNC signals for the AIF2 module is correct. I've read the documentation and some forum posts about these signals but still want to make sure we are using them correctly in our system. I'm attaching a block diagram of our current connectivity to illustrate our architecture.

Looking at the diagram you can see that our FPGA selects timing information from one of a variety of sources. This serves as the master timing signal for the node. RADSYNC and PHYSYNC are then generated from the FPGA and fed to the DSP. As the diagram illustrates, we have 4 links allotted to systems off board. Assuming that the off board links are implemented as CPRI, it is my understanding that all timing and framing information is contained within the protocol's packets, and that the PHYSYNC and RADSYNC signals need only be fed to the DSP from the node's master timing source. (In this case the FPGA with it's timing inputs.) Furthermore, I'd like to know if the two SYNC signal need to be synchronous with any external events. From my reading this seems not be the case.

Please comment on my understanding, questions, and the implementation in general as needed. We want to make sure we get this straight.

Thanks

Kevin

digital_board_aif2_connections.pdf
  • Kevin,

    TCI66xx devices are not supported on the forum.  They are supported directly through your local Field Applications Engineer (FAE.)  Please contact your local FAE for direct support.  If you are not certain who your local FAE is, then please contact your local Field Sales / Technical Sales representative.

    Best Regards,

    Chad

  • Hi Chad,

    Thank you for the response.

    I decided to post this question due to the lack of information flow from our FAE. Furthermore, I have read at least one post in this forum for the part mentioned in the subject. In particular I noted that Albert Bae responded to questions regarding the AIF2 interface. It is my hope to get his feedback on the matter.

    Regards,
    Kevin

  • Kevin,

    The feedback would most likely come from Albert, but it's not supported via the forum.  If there's an AIF2 post response on TCI66xx devices on the forum, then it should not have occurred as it's a different support infrastructure.  If you're having problems with your local FAE, then you should contact your local sales representative.  I apologize for any disruption, but the TCI66xx devices are not mass market devices and are not supported on the forum.

    Best Regards,

    Chad