This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
I am using the FDC2114 for capacitive measurements. I measure capacities in the range from 22 pF to 100 pF and I observe a deviation from the actual capacities I cannot explain. Can you please provide detailed feedback as the FDC2114 device is not working as expected?
For my sensor capacity, I use "reference capacitors", meaning that I insert capacitors from 22 pF to 100 pF instead of a real sensor.
I face some issues concerning the calculation of the capacitance out of the conversion result from the DATA register. Here are the conversion results, the sensor frequency and the capacity I calculate out of the sensor frequency and the comparison with the reference / actual capacity.
DATA [Hex] |
DATA [Dec] |
fSENSOR [Hz] (calculated) |
Capacity [pF] (calculated from fSENSOR) |
Actual Capacity [pF] |
3e0 |
992 |
1162500 |
27,56 |
22 |
3ba |
954 |
1117968,75 |
29,80 |
27 |
396 |
918 |
1075781,25 |
32,19 |
33 |
352 |
850 |
996093,75 |
37,54 |
47 |
306 |
774 |
907031,25 |
45,28 |
68 |
2b6 |
694 |
813281,25 |
56,32 |
100 |
For the calculation of fSENSOR, I use formula (8) from the data sheet with the following register / frequency configuration: FIN_SEL = 2, f_REF = 2,4 MHz, OUTPUT_GAIN = 0, OFFSET = 0.
I provide an Excel file with a section of the circuit diagram, the data from above and a graphical representation of these data.
The issue I am concerned about in these data is the fact that the calculated capacity is below the actual capacity for some capacitors and it is above the actual capacity for some other capacitors.
Of course, my readout of the DATA register and therefore the calculated capacity values do also include parasitic capacities. But this doesn't explain the graph I see above. I checked with a LCR meter that parasitic capacities add roughly the same capacity to each actual capacity.
I also tried a second LC tank for my measurements. These are the measurement results:
DATA [Hex] |
DATA [Dec] |
fSENSOR [Hz] (calculated) |
Capacity [pF] (calculated from fSENSOR) |
Actual Capacity [pF] |
6C0 |
1728 |
2025000 |
61,77 |
22 |
6a1 |
1697 |
1988671,875 |
64,05 |
27 |
681 |
1665 |
1951171,875 |
66,53 |
33 |
63e |
1598 |
1872656,25 |
72,23 |
47 |
5e7 |
1511 |
1770703,125 |
80,79 |
68 |
583 |
1411 |
1653515,625 |
92,65 |
100 |
50e |
1294 |
1516406,25 |
110,16 |
150 |
A section of the circuit diagram, the measurement results from the table above and a graphical representation is also provided in the Excel file from above. For the measurements with the second LC tank, I also observe the behaviour that some calculated capacities are below the actual capacity and some capacities are above the actual capacity.
Can you please look in detail at the provided information and give detailed feeback about my issues?
Best regards,
Andrea
Hi Andrea,
Let me go over the details and get back to you early next week.
Regards,
Sharath
Hi Andrea,
Can you measure the actual frequency at the input pins to make sure that you are correlating with the calculated frequency?
These FDC capacitive sensing devices are used for relative capacitance measurement only and are not suitable for absolute capacitance measurement. A typical application is a liquid level sensing where the change in the liquid level can be detected.
Regards
Sharath.
Hello Sharath,
I was able to solve my issues by using a different LC tank with a bigger capacitor.
Regards
Andrea