This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CC1190: CC1310 + CC1190 no transmission distance extention

Part Number: CC1190
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC1310

Hello!

Some time ago i asked for RF layout review for cc1310+cc1190 solution. Now i finally get my device and I'm trying to test maximum RF transmission distance.

I am sending simple packets from my device and receiving them with cc1310 launchpad in SmartRF Studio. Transmission is based on RfPacketTx example with the addition of amplifier control.

1. For 30 meters (through 2 floors) between receiver and transmitter:

Low Gain Mode (PA_EN high, HGM/LNA_EN low):
13:08:01.350 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -73
13:08:02.190 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:08:03.015 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:03.841 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:08:06.165 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:07.005 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:07.829 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:08.655 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:09.482 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -73
13:08:10.311 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:11.141 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:08:11.975 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:08:12.799 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:08:13.630 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74

High Gain Mode (PA_EN/HGM high, LNA_EN low). I expected better RSSI level, but it remains same:
13:15:12.888 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:15:13.717 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:15:14.543 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:15:16.869 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:15:17.709 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:15:18.537 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:15:19.363 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:15:20.191 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -74
13:15:21.017 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -75
13:15:21.843 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -76
13:15:22.683 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -76
13:15:23.499 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -76
13:15:24.339 | 0d | 59959 | 39 33 31 32 34 35 33 34 31 34 2a | -76

2. The maximum distance at which packets are transmitted without errors also turned out to be the same (about 300 meters) for High and Low Gain modes.

I checked, that voltage level on PA_EN and HGM pins actually equals 3.3 volts.
The only difference between my design and CC1310-1190 launchpad is that i am using helical antenna.

I can’t understand why turning on the amplifier does not affect signal strength.

  • Are you able to do conducted output power measurements? 

  • I'm afraid that all I can do (with available equipment) is to connect the equivalent of a 50 ohm antenna (resistor) and measure voltage at transmission with an oscilloscope.

  • More or less all measurements are done with HGM = 1 so I don't have any numbers on how much the output power will change if you set HGM = 0. 

    How are you planning to verify that your design has the wanted performance? It's not possible for me to judge the performance with the measurement you present since the attenuation between two floors will be different from building to building. 

  • Thank you for quick reply!

    To verify wanted performance I planned to compare cc1310 (we already developed such device) distance to cc1310+cc1190 transmission distance. At the moment, I see no significant difference either in line of sight / nor through the walls. As I understand it, with a copied launchpad-design, the problem can be either in the antenna or in manufactoring.

    If i understand "Debugging Communication Range" (SWRA603) correctly, I can connect my device antenna point directly to launchpad antenna point via attenuator and measure rssi value on launchpad side.

    But I still have some questions: are there any restrictions related to what attenuation should the attenuator have so that the transmission does not damage the receiver? Will 3dB be enough? What conducted power (RSSI - in my case) should I expect, if cc1190 works properly?

    I will make such mesurements with cc1310 only and with cc1310+cc1190 for proper comparison.

  • To measure RSSI you have to ensure that you get a level that don't saturate the receiver, see the CC1310 datasheet, typically you need to keep the input lower than about -10 dBm which indicate that you should have 40 dB of attenuation (given that you may have 27 dBm out)

  • Sorry for late reply! It seems that my problem was easier than I expected.

    I replaced default launchpad antenna matching circuit with a single 0 ohm resistor, because (as I understand it) antenna I'm using already has 50 Ohm impedance. Transmission quality and range greatly improved.