Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LP-XDS110ET, CC1354P10, CC3301, BP-CC33-BBB-ADAPT, LP-EM-CC1354P10
Tool/software:
Dear TI Sirs:
I use the cc33xx-mcu-plugin-ble-0.6 from MySecure.
I have board LP-EM-CC1354P10-1 with BP-CC3301.
However due to I have no LP-XDS110ET but only XDS110, I contact the local support and confirm the XDS110 is also working as long as not to use the energy trace feature.
I connect the board as describe inside the document:
XDS110 PWR3V3 ==> LP-EM_CC1354P10 ==> BP-CC3301
After I connect the board as described inside "CC13xx/26xx Host: Getting Started Guide" section "Setup - CC13xx/CC26xx and CC33xx"
In the above case, I always get "SPI not responsive" from console. Latter I measure the power on BP-CC3301, I got 3V2 on pin 3V3 and 0.9V on pin 5V, it seems the power is not correct and not enough, so I decide to measure the same board in BeagleBone Black, which when startup and CC3301 is running, the power is 3V4 on pin 3V3 and 5V1 on pin 5V.
After this, I suppose the power is something weird in my setup, so I change to power from BBB. And the BBB is not running both eMMC is empty and SD is not attached.
At this case,
BBB PWR 3V3 ==> BP-CC3301 & LP-EM_CC1354P10
When running in the above case, I see following:
And
However, it failed on the end:
And I try to attach the XDS110 to see what had happened above. However at this time, I always see the "SPI not responsive" as long as I run in debugger.
I know inside the document TI uses LP-XDS110ET to power to do everything for the example,
my questions are:
1. Have TI ever try to use a XDS110? If yes, at this case, I do you connect the board and power it?
2. What is the PG version of BP-CC3301 you used on the example? PG2 or PG1?
Regrds,
/ckhsu