Thank you for answering my initial question. I did enable the 2.500V reference with your help and get an output from the DAC once I understood that it could run in either 12 bit and 16 bit mode. I was unaware of this and presumed that the DAC61402 was…
Part Number: DAC61402 Hello,
are you able to just state if these are correctly marked?
datasheet states : D61402; physical parts are PDC6E02
TI label
TI physical parts
Part Number: DAC61402EVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DAC61402 Hello support team,
I am implementing the management of the DAC61402 and I have seen a behavior not described in the data sheet.
If the SPICONFIG register is configured with the SDO-EN…
Hi,
Sorry for this, since we didn't verify the EVM software on Linux platform.
Can be due to the port enumeration in Linux, I am not sure though
Regards,
AK
Part Number: DAC61402EVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DAC81402 , DAC61402 , DAC814XXEVM-GUI , DAC81404EVM Tool/software: Hello,
I am following the user guide for the BP-DAC61402-EVM to download/install the evaluation software. The guide points me to…
Part Number: MSP-EXP432E401Y Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DAC61402 , Hi all, I have ordered MSP-EXP432E401Y LaunchPad and BP-DAC81404EVM integrated with DAC61402, so how to develop MSP-EXP432E401Y with CCS to make it output different voltages? I want to…
Hi Kiran, Your SPI frame is not correct and has following issue -
1. Number of clocks are more than 24 (=~26) - not okay 2. Your SDIN data is not latching on the clock falling edge, it's on the clock rise edge - not okay For DAC61402, SPI frame should…
Part Number: DAC53701 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DAC60502 , DAC61402 Hi experts,
My customer wants to find a cost-effective device to replace AD5722RBREZ. Is DAC53701 suitable device? If no, please help to find one. Many thanks.
BR,
Victoria
Part Number: DAC7800 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DAC61402 Hi experts,
My customer is using AD5722RBREZ. Is DAC7800 suitable to replace it? And is it recommended for new design? Thanks.
BR,
Victoria
Hi Archie,
This is a typo in the DACx1404 and DACx1402 datasheets. The devices IDs were swapped between the two datasheets. The correct device IDs are:
DAC81404 : 0x029C
DAC81402 : 0x0298
DAC61404 : 0x024C
DAC61402 : 0x0248
Shifting 0x24C left…
