HI Balaji,
Balaji Appadurai45 said: Star Topology is preferred over Daisy Chain(refer below picture), TMS320F28388D Controller is capable of supporting 8 receivers and 2 transmitter. However 2 or 3 Nodes and 1 lead are needed as per our requirements. Kindly…
Part Number: THVD1450 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDM-02006 The TIDM-02006 design uses the THVD1450 with 50 MHz FSI interface to a C2000 process. The FSI interface has a clock and data line. I do not wish to calibrate the delay between clock and…
Part Number: TMS320F28386D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDM-02006 , DESIGNDRIVE Hi,
I am trying to identify a MCU for my motor control application. My application has DC servomotors. I am inclined towards TMS320F28386D. I read about the Utilizing Sitara…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320F28335 , TIDM-02006 Dear Sir,
we have deployed by now a large number of ECS solutions based on the combination of the MCU (TMS320F28335) and PLD (Artix 7 series) devices, closely interconnected…
Part Number: TMS320F28388D More of a comment here than question. This is related to the suggestions found on a question asked by Arjan Oskam; " FSI example fsi_ex16_daisy_handshake fails when using FSI_DATA_WIDTH_2_LANE ." I have been going through…
I wouldn't say it is better with one vs. the other.
In general the C2000 CPU is 50% - 100% more effective MHz than Arm M4F for these type of control loops, but the Arm devices are often running at 50-100% higher clock rates so it effectively evens…