Part Number: TMS320C6727 I have a code base that been compiled with CCS3.3 since 2007. I am upgrading to the 7.4 compiler(finally) and am running into an issue during linking. I get the following warnings:
"TISecondaryBoot.c", line 156 (approximate…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Hi,
I am one of the third-parties alluded to in the thread:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/processors-group/processors/f/processors-forum/1096910/tms320c6727-future-compiler-support/4062831
The macOS build of the v7.4.24 CGT…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Hello team,
My customer uses the C6727 series DSP processors for several of products that also support third-party algorithm development. Given the fact that the compiler tools for this processor have not been updated in quite…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Do you have a simple “hello world” program for the TMS320C6727 which initializes the chip, and starts up a while loop that waits for audio input, reads the audio input from the input pins into a buffer and then writes out the…
Ki, it appears the name resolution from GEL doesn't work as described from my perspective. However, I've been able to utilize the functionality of the command as intended. I'm having further issues; I'll continue this on another article. Thank you,
…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Hi,
I have been using the PADK(which has the TMS320C6727) to perform active noise control system.
I have programmed the PADK using CCS 4.2 via the blackhawk emulator.
But when i got…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Experts,
I'm trying to migrate our old DSP design from CCS3.3 to a newer version we have. I did with CCS5.5. The image works. But with CCS6.2, the image doesn't work although there is no compilation…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320C6414T Filter ACF-451832-333,-223,-153,-103 and EXCCET103U for TMS320C6414T are obsolete.I look the filter to replace .
Regarding ...
Guanglei said: "warning #16002-D: build attribute vendor section TI missing in "../lib/applySystemPatch.obj": compatibility cannot be determined"
This forum post discusses a similar situation.
Regarding ...
Guanglei said: "undefined…
Inlining does not directly address the RVO problem. Rather, because everything now occurs within a single function, there is a chance some of the copies may be optimized away. As you have seen, it does not always work out.
Thanks and regards,
-Ge…