Part Number: TMS320C6727 I have a code base that been compiled with CCS3.3 since 2007. I am upgrading to the 7.4 compiler(finally) and am running into an issue during linking. I get the following warnings:
"TISecondaryBoot.c", line 156 (approximate…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Hi,
I am one of the third-parties alluded to in the thread:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/processors-group/processors/f/processors-forum/1096910/tms320c6727-future-compiler-support/4062831
The macOS build of the v7.4.24 CGT…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Hello team,
My customer uses the C6727 series DSP processors for several of products that also support third-party algorithm development. Given the fact that the compiler tools for this processor have not been updated in quite…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Do you have a simple “hello world” program for the TMS320C6727 which initializes the chip, and starts up a while loop that waits for audio input, reads the audio input from the input pins into a buffer and then writes out the…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Hi,
I have been using the PADK(which has the TMS320C6727) to perform active noise control system.
I have programmed the PADK using CCS 4.2 via the blackhawk emulator.
But when i got…
Ki, it appears the name resolution from GEL doesn't work as described from my perspective. However, I've been able to utilize the functionality of the command as intended. I'm having further issues; I'll continue this on another article. Thank you,
…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Experts,
I'm trying to migrate our old DSP design from CCS3.3 to a newer version we have. I did with CCS5.5. The image works. But with CCS6.2, the image doesn't work although there is no compilation…
Part Number: TMS320C6727 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320C6414T Filter ACF-451832-333,-223,-153,-103 and EXCCET103U for TMS320C6414T are obsolete.I look the filter to replace .
Regarding ...
Guanglei said: "warning #16002-D: build attribute vendor section TI missing in "../lib/applySystemPatch.obj": compatibility cannot be determined"
This forum post discusses a similar situation.
Regarding ...
Guanglei said: "undefined…
Inlining does not directly address the RVO problem. Rather, because everything now occurs within a single function, there is a chance some of the copies may be optimized away. As you have seen, it does not always work out.
Thanks and regards,
-Ge…