Hello
I have a circuit of OPA348.
i do the simulation.
But when I do the test, the settling time is much longer than expected.
I wonder why for the difference
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello
I have a circuit of OPA348.
i do the simulation.
But when I do the test, the settling time is much longer than expected.
I wonder why for the difference
Hi,
have you considered the impact of capacitive load on the settling time?
It's not recommended to run a micropower OPAmp as a comparator. TI has tons of brilliant low power comparators being designed for right this job
Kai
Hello user,
The waveforms are really small and blurry, so I can only can see the shapes, not the scales.
The first flat part of output is overload recovery time. The output was slammed against the negative supply rail, 0V. The op amp is not linear in beginning.
The rest of the time in the waveform is slew rate limited. You get the full slew rate for a while, then the input difference drops (below 100mV) and slew rate slows down.
[FAQ] Why does the slew rate in my application not match the op amp’s data sheet?
Hello,
Was the issue resolved? I will mark Ron & Kai's answer as "TI Thinks Resolved," please confirm.
If the issue isn't resolved, please let us know so we may further assist.
All the best,
Carolina