This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
The OPA196/7 are unity-gain stable. Decompensated opamps (like the OPA228) are marked as such in the datasheet and in the search function (it's a checkbox in "Features"), and specify the minimum closed-loop gain in the electrical characteristics.
TTD,
OPA196 and OPA197 are unity-gain stable but when driving directly (with no Riso resistor) their capacitive load is limited. Thus, for example, OPA197 graph shows that driving 300pF load the small-signal overshoot is 25% (the maximum recommended to assure stability over process variation) - see below.
Thus, for example, you cannot drive directly 1uF load - see below.
However, adding just 5 ohm Riso resistor makes the circuit stable - see below.
The above solution works well if there is no resistive load, which otherwise would cause a gain error - see below.
Thus, to solve the gain error problem the solution is to use dual-feedback compensation as shown below.
To confirm stable operation you may also run AC stability simulation showing 83 degrees phase margin whereas the minimum recommended is 45 degrees - see below.
Please review circuit stability training material under following link:
Below I have attached Tina-TI schematics for your own simulations.
Hi Marek Lis,
Thank you for suggesting the attention.
When I use OPA196/7, consider the capacitive load limitation.
Also OPA202 has high capacitive load and reasonable cost.
Best Regards,
TTD