This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

OPA196: Unity gain stable

Part Number: OPA196
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA197, OPA228, TINA-TI, OPA202

Dear Technical Support Team,

Are OPA196 and OPA197 unity gain stable?

Datasheets described unity gain bandwidth.

Do you have selection guide for unity gain stable?

Best Regards,

ttd

  • The OPA196/7 are unity-gain stable. Decompensated opamps (like the OPA228) are marked as such in the datasheet and in the search function (it's a checkbox in "Features"), and specify the minimum closed-loop gain in the electrical characteristics.

  • TTD,

    OPA196 and OPA197 are unity-gain stable but when driving directly (with no Riso resistor) their capacitive load is limited.  Thus, for example, OPA197 graph shows that driving 300pF load the small-signal overshoot is 25% (the maximum recommended to assure stability over process variation) - see below.

    Thus, for example, you cannot drive directly 1uF load - see below.

    However, adding just 5 ohm Riso resistor makes the circuit stable - see below.

    The above solution works well if there is no resistive load, which otherwise would cause a gain error - see below.

    Thus, to solve the gain error problem the solution is to use dual-feedback compensation as shown below.

    To confirm stable operation you may also run AC stability simulation showing 83 degrees phase margin whereas the  minimum recommended is 45 degrees - see below.

    Please review circuit stability training material under following link: 

    https://training.ti.com/ti-precision-labs-op-amps-stability-introduction?context=1139747-1139745-14685-1138805-13848

    Below I have attached Tina-TI schematics for your own simulations.

    OPA197 Transient stability.TSCOPA197 AC stability.TSC

  • Hi Marek Lis,

    Thank you for suggesting the attention.

    When I use OPA196/7, consider the  capacitive load limitation.

    Also OPA202 has high capacitive load and reasonable cost. 

    Best Regards,

    TTD

  • Good luck!