Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA445,
Hello. I've "inherited" a circuit that had OPA445 and now OPA462 HV Op-amps.
Investigating some possible settling time issues. Some unexpected behaviour apparently related to input bias current.
Before I overload with detail her - Examining the pcb layout data I can see that nothing appears to have been done with the "PowerPad".
The previous iteration used OPA445 SO8 without the PowerPad but the OPA462 is available only with the PowerPad option.
All the TI documentation states that this should be tied to VEE (as supplied to pin 4) even for low power applications. But after having read the TI notes on the "PowerPad"
I remain unclear why this is the case and whether it might cause the behaviour I am seeing. Is having the PowerPad floating a problem from an electrical perspective (the device is low dissipation in this application).
Floating ill defined potential ? Leakage Current ? etc.
The functional problem I see is that the op-amp output does not reach the correct input (same as input voltage) when changing input protection diodes.
In summary replacing input protection / clamp diodes with low leakage types (BAS116 in place of BAS16) stops the buffer working properly.
It's quite a complex setup with the op amp running on 'flying rails' referenced to a high voltage (in this particular case several hundred volts with voltage rails c +/-66V relative to that.
E/D and E/D Com are not connnected. the voltage there looks fine c. 3.6V and I've also tried taking E/D to the reference voltage via a 33pf cap.
I'll stop with the detail there to check if the advice is that with PowerPad not tied to VEE then it's likely to be "all sorts of wrong".