This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

INA301: Pspice model produces errors in LTspice

Part Number: INA301

Hello,

Just want to inform you that when translated to LTspice models two non fatal errors occur. 

There are two floating nodes in the SPICE-models of the INA301A1, INA301A2, INA301A3.
Files: sboma60.lib (ina301a1.lib ina301a2.lib ina301a3.lib)

INA301A1, ina301a1.lib
.SUBCKT INA301A1_OPA VIP VIN VDD VSS VO
Node "7" floating

.SUBCKT OUT_CURRENT_CLAMP  IN  OUT  VIMON
Node  "OUTx" floating


INA301A2, ina301a2.lib
.SUBCKT INA301A2_OPA VIP VIN VDD VSS VO
Node "7" floating

.SUBCKT OUT_CURRENT_CLAMP  IN  OUT  VIMON
Node  "OUTx" floating


INA301A3, ina301a3.lib
.SUBCKT INA301A3_OPA VIP VIN VDD VSS VO
Node "7" floating

.SUBCKT OUT_CURRENT_CLAMP  IN  OUT  VIMON
Node  "OUTx" floating

Thank you,

  • Hi Kurt,

    Unfortunately TI cannot support LTSpice due to its EULA, which prohibits the competitors of ADI/LT (such as TI) from using LTSpice to promote their products. I have confirmed that the INA301 model works with no issues in both TINA and Cadence PSpice, which are our supported simulators.

    However, there a couple general things you can try to resolve this. First, make sure that Gmin stepping is enabled. Gmin stepping adds very small conductances to GND at each node, which can help with floating node errors. You can also try different solver settings. If that doesn't work, you can try adding large resistors from the floating nodes to node '0' (GND) which will force them to have a DC path to GND.

    Unfortunately due to the EULA, I'm unable to assist any further with this debug.

    Best regards,

    Ian Williams
    Applications Manager
    Current Sensing

  • Hi Kurt,

    I would heavily recommend to run the INA301 TINA-TI Reference Design

    I see no reason to simulate the INA301 in LTSpice.

    Kai