Hi Team
We did the welding test and found that the PIN of the product did not stick tin, so the welding could not be successful.
Help to confirm whether the material has been oxidized? thank you
Best
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Team
We did the welding test and found that the PIN of the product did not stick tin, so the welding could not be successful.
Help to confirm whether the material has been oxidized? thank you
Best
Hello Xiaoqing,
Can you provide a top side picture with all the symbolization clearly readable.
Xiaoqing,
This package has as roughed lead frame with a NIPDAU | SN lead finish. This finish is less shiny but it better for solderability. LM2904P is also a big package with large leads. The time window for the experiment is a wide 2 to 3 seconds. That is a big window. The missing solder is near the top where the temperature may not have been high enough to draw solder.
If a non roughened lead finish is desired then try LM2904PE4 which has a NIPDAU lead finish.
More information in this post. e2e.ti.com/.../718449
Xiaoqing,
I will consult other team members with more packaging and soldering experience to get more advice. I will reply with an update within 3 days.
Xiaoqing,
JEDEC has a test procedure under J-STD-002D. It included both SnPb and Pb-free test for different type of packages. The test time is a little short. The package also need to go through a flux bath prior to solder dip. The immersion rate will also affect the test results.
Flux time should be 5 to 10 seconds and solder time should be between 4.5 and 5.5 seconds