This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
I'm using the LM239 quad-comparator in my design and I want to prevent unstability or unknown outputs in the scenario where the two inputs have the same value, for example = 0V. (This case is possible because I have two status signals connected at the inputs). Although it is a comparator I think there are no "internal protections" to avoid that.
What is your recommendation for that purpose?
My LM239 is connected to Vcc=3.3V and the input signals which can go from 0V to 2.5V (digital values)
Thanks for your support!
Best regards,
David
Hi David,
Please see the LM339 family appnote, section 5.2.1.:
Application Design Guidelines for LM339, LM393, TL331 Family Comparators (Rev. A)
You also may wish to review section 2.3 on input voltage range.
Ideally you should use Vcc-2V for the limit, which would be 1.3V on a 3.3V supply.It is up to you if you wish to rely on the "feature".
You may wish to investigate the new LM339LV, which has a R-R input and can accept up to 5V on the inputs.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your answer.
I have simulated my circuit and finally decided to change the logic to avoid the scenario --> IN+ = 0V / IN- =0V
Regards.
Hi David,
Excellent. Glad we could help.
Equal inputs is (technically) a indeterminate condition and at the mercy of the devices unique offset voltage. Make sure any applied bias covers the range of possible maximum offset (±9mV for the LM239).
If you are satisfied with your answer, please click the "Question Answered" button to close out.