This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
I have a doubt in use of BIASOUT pin for AC impedance and EEG measurement.
Everywhere on the internet I have read that BIAS pin act as a 'Driven Ground' and is used to cancel out the noise and set the common mode inputs within limits. In AC impedance calculation, this pin acts as a current sink/source to the internal current source attached.
But when I perform raw EEG data collection or AC impedance testing, I can see that the noise becomes very less when I short ADS1299 ground pin (0V) to the Bias pin. In AC impedance testing my values are under 10% error after shorting BIAS and ground pin together, otherwise the error is >60% when no ground pin is used.
For information: I am using internal reference (AVSS+AVDD)/2 (i.e. BIAS_REF_INT=1) and using SRB1 to route all the negative input of amplifier to one pin. And since I am using only channnel 8 as of now, I am setting BIAS8P and BIAS8N to 1 (these are set in BIAS_SENSP and BIAS_SENSN)
The doubt arises here that in my electronics circuit classes I have been taught that to measure voltage accross a foreign load one must need to set a common reference by connecting a ground pin to it. Then only one can be certain about the voltage readings accross it otherwise it will be arbitrary. I think similar thing is happening here. But there was no anecdote about connecting ground wire to human body/ load in EEG measurement and AC impedance testing as all is done by BIAS pin itself.
Please help me get the concepts right as I am facing problem with the BIAS pin itself and suggest a way to connect the pins.
(I have referring an OpenBCI and EEG Hacker blog for AC impedance: http://eeghacker.blogspot.com/2014/04/openbci-measuring-electrode-impedance.html where they are not using ground pin but still getting minimum errors )
In continuation from point-3 asked by someone in https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/825254/ads1299-bias-reference-and-ground. The reply was to short reference, bias and ground together. But nowhere in the datasheet was mentioned about ground to short with BIAS. That's where my confusion is. By connecting ground to bias i am getting more accurate results under 10% otherwise >80% error. Please help me with this concept.
Hi Swapniil,
If you use the BIAS pin to bias the body and the SRB1 connection (INxN input pins), the AC lead-off should work similarly when the BIAS is set to 0V in the bipolar supply application (VCM=0V). The scheme explained in the OpenBCI/EEF Hacker blog you refer to uses the BIAS electrode to drive the body.
For a better understanding of the AC lead-off, please see the reference e2e post below for some TINA simulations on the DC/AC-leadoff for the ADS1298, which uses the same DC/AC lead-off scheme. The TINA simulation should help to understand the AC-leadoff for various designs and test conditions.
Output from the BIAS amplifier is mainly used to drive an electrode to set the bias for the body. The scheme is also used to improve the CMRR of the application as described in the App Note SBAA188.
In continuation from point-3 asked by someone in https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/825254/ads1299-bias-reference-and-ground. The reply was to short reference, bias and ground together. But nowhere in the datasheet was mentioned about ground to short with BIAS. That's where my confusion is. By connecting ground to bias i am getting more accurate results under 10% otherwise >80% error. Please help me with this concept.
The E2E post recommends connecting the device analog and digital ground. However, the reference and BIAS connections are specific to the design of the system. Please see Figures 72 and 73 for the difference scheme in an EEG application.
Thanks
-TC