DAC8311: Reasons for MSL downgrade and PCN schedule

Hi,

I will check with quality team on this and revert back to you. Please allow a day or two.

Regards,

AK

Akhilesh -san, 

Thanks for your replay and supporting. 

We'll wait your following information. 

Thnaks and best regards,

Junichi Komura@TED(Tokyo Electron Device)

Our quality team is looking into this now.

Frost -san, 

Thank you for your reply and status. 

So do you have any update information or plan for this answer?

We appricate your help.

Best regards,

Junichi Komura@Tokyo Electron Device

I am still looking at the history of this and coordinating with the quality team.  I am hopping to get an answer this week.

Hi Komura-san,

Our initial investigation shows that this update to the datasheet was an error, and no change in qualification level actually occurred.  I am working with our documentation team to find the cause of the error and get the documentation corrected.

Thanks,

Paul

Frost -san, 

Thank you very much for your supporting and information.

It's fine that no change in qualification level. 

So, due to follow our customers with current MSL-2 reels, would you please give below information.
1. When finish to fix document?
2. Are there any plan of customer notification or info on Web?
3. Are there any other products which have mistaken MSL?

Thanks and best regards,

Junichi Komura@Tokyo Electron Device

Hi Komura-san,

1. I have not received an estimate yet.  I will update when I have a more precise time frame.

2. The information on the web will be updated at the same time. 

The last section of each data sheet contains this information. The yellow highlight states the Package option addendum (POA) is subject to change without notice or revision of the data sheet. If the customer subscribed to “alerts” they will be notified when the POA or appended images are changed.

3. I am not aware of any specifically effected by this beyond the DAC8411 and DAC8311.

Thanks,

Paul