This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

XIO2001: Product manufacturing date code - top marking

Part Number: XIO2001

Hello,

we have components here with the following date code: $4A-43C2R2W.

What does this mean in detail?

Is there a decoding for the XIO2001 or where can I find a decoding?

Best regards

Nils Panitzsch

  • Hi Nils,

    I am looking into this and will follow up.

    Regards,

    Nicholaus

  • Hi Nils,

    This was the response from quality regarding date code markings on packages.

    "Counterfeiting is a growing threat to our industry.  Because our topside marking is critical to our anti-counterfeiting efforts, TI does not translate that marking for customers because publicizing that information increases our counterfeiting risk and exposure.

    • TI provides information related to our part markings @ http://www.ti.com/packaging/docs/partlookup.tsp#divline
    • TI is committed to helping our customers purchase high-quality, authentic, and trustworthy TI products.
    • TI is actively involved in anti-counterfeiting efforts and for many years has been cooperating with government, law enforcement agencies, other semiconductor companies, industry associations and customers to help combat this industry-wide problem.
    • We strongly encourage our customers to purchase their products directly from TI or through TI authorized distributors.
    • Our authorized distributors provide the date code information with their shipping paperwork.  Please address any questions through your supply chain.
    • A complete list of TI’s authorized distributors around the world can be found at http://www.ti.com/general/docs/distributorinfo.tsp.

    Date code information is provided on the shipping paperwork when parts are purchased directly from TI or one of our authorized distributors. "

    If this resolves your issue please mark as resolved.

    Thanks,

    Nicholaus