This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CD74HC4050: internal structure

Part Number: CD74HC4050
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74ACT08

Hi expert,

Customer has some failure and I want to get the  internal structure of CD74HC4050M96 for better explanation.

BR

Emma

  • Hi Emma,

    Could you give some details as to what the failure is? If you provide some scope shots of what's going wrong, a schematic of how the customer has configured the device, a detailed description of the issue, etc. then I would be more than happy to try and assist you with the problem.

    The internal design of the device is proprietary information which we can't really provide to you.

    Best,

    Malcolm

  • Hi Malcolm,

    They will have this kind of phenomenon.

    The input is 3.3V, but the output could be 1V or 0.36V.

    and since the project will go mass production soon.

    they need TI to analyze the potential reason quickly.

    I read this article ,https://www.ti.com/lit/an/szza036c/szza036c.pdf

    And I only find the Technology :HC/HCT – High-Speed CMOS Logic

    I don't see this device has any special features, could you kindly help to confirm that?

    C – Configurable VCC (LVCC) D – Level-Shifting Diode (CBTD) H – Bus Hold (ALVCH) K – Undershoot-Protection Circuitry (CBTK) R – Damping Resistor on Inputs/Outputs (LVCR) S – Schottky Clamping Diode (CBTS) Z – Power-Up 3-State (LVCZ)

    their SCH is as below. if their MCU has a long trace to the input of the buffer, is there any risk?

    This device is really old, do we have a P2P device with better performance? 

    BR

    Emma

  • Hi Emma,

    There aren't any of those special features with this device. Long traces to the input also run the risk of reflections if you don't match impedances which could definitely affect device performance. It's harder for me to debug without seeing scope shots of the input/output/power. Nothing looks inherently wrong with your connections.

    There are no exact P2P devices that will perform better. I'd recommend the SN74HCS365DR but this device is not P2P. It's also 3-state outputs instead of push-pull.

    Best,

    Malcolm

  • Malcolm,

    What is the output current for recommendation?

    We can only see the max current is 25mA on datasheet, but I can see another drive current on another slides.

    I don't know how to understand it. Since customer can measure the output current peak value is 8mA, RMS is about 2mA.

    and customer also replace the CD74HC4050M96 with SN74ACT08(with another input always high) on the same board.

    they try many times and the fail will not happen again, so I want to check whether it is the output drive current cause the issue.

    BR

    Emma

  • The colored table shows recommended output currents. This is the largest output current for which a voltage drop is specified and guaranteed. Exceeding this current is allowed (up to the absolute maximum rating), but then the output voltage is no longer guaranteed.

    The recommended output current can be found as a test condition for the VOL/VOH specifications. It depends on the supply voltage, so for HC at 3.3 V, it will be less than 4 mA.

    If this problem happened only once, then I'd guess that that chip got damaged, probably due to overvoltage (ESD).

  • Clemens,

    Thanks for your answer on the output current explanation.

    Besides,  in this video: www.ti.com/.../basics-of-logic-and-translation.html. it shows output current for gates and drivers.

    Could you kindly give me more explanation on it?

    for the failure, which the output can not track input. Unfortunately, it happened on many machines.

    their output is drive a transistor and the schematic is as below:

    the output trace is quite long(since the transistor is one the other board), but it is not a high speed signal, it is only for on and off to drive next stage relay.

    and the R105 in the schematic is close to the transistor.

    Still, the oscilloscope can measure -3.6V voltage on output pin when the relay is turn-on. (still not very clear it is a noise into oscilloscope or the buffer device pin is also affected.)

    so if there did some noise can affect the output pin, do you have some recommend method to improve it.

    BR

    Emma

  • Hi Emma,

    Did you mean 0.36V like you said earlier?

    Have you tested the part in isolation from this transistor? I would really like to see if the part works as expected in isolation from this second stage.

    The picture you posted is again just stating what the recommended output currents are. You can exceed these but, as Clemens said, the output voltage is no longer guaranteed once you do. In other words, if the output is giving 8mA of current like you mentioned the output voltage might not be as expected for HC devices, although I wouldn't expect it to be that much of a difference.

    Best,

    Malcolm

  • Hi Malcolm,

    I just get some damaged part from customer and do bench test, with a 3.3Kohm as output load.

    VCC=5V,
    Input 100khz square waveform,high level =4.7V Low level =0.1V.

    The good device output voltage level is correct:

    However, the damaged part output voltage level is incorrect:

    I have test two channels and both channels are abnormal, so what could be the potential reason to cause the damage?

    Could the internal voltage supply circuit is wrong?

    BR

    Emma

  • Hi Emma,

    There are a few possibilities:

    1. You mentioned that the output connects to a stage on another board. What is the process for connecting these boards? If these are handled by a human or machine in an ESD-unsafe environment, that could cause ESD damage to the part which would explain the issue. It is possible that these devices are receiving ESD damage and the ESD circuitry on the output is acting as resistance, which is why the output still falls high/low but fails to rise completely to the expected voltage.
    2. How long exactly is the trace connecting the output to the transistor? What is the resistive permittivity of the trace? If the trace is too long and there's too much capacitance the device is going to be outputting too much current and will be damaged. You mentioned 8mA peak current earlier but you didn't explain how that current was measured. How close is the 2.2k resistor to the output? 
    3. What is the input voltage transition time? I still have not seen a scope shot of the output voltage following the input. If the input transition time is violated this could also damage the part.

    Otherwise, if you don't think any of these things are issues, there's nothing more I can see that might explain why the part isn't working. It is an old part on an old die. 

    Best,

    Malcolm

  • Malcolm,

    Thanks for your explanation.

    In my test, I just use the signal generator and input transition time is very fast.

    and what is the requirement for the transition time? Is this requirement? Then it must be followed.

    Besides, I can not find the ESD level for this part, CD74HC4050M96. Could you kindly give me more information?

    BR

    Emma

  • Malcolm,

    Besides, they reported the failure after the machine running some time, so they don't think it is caused by ESD.

    And they capture some spike voltage on output pin, do you think it will break the device? the duration is less than 10ns.

      

    Since there is no description on output pin voltage on absolute value, so I just want to check it with you.

    Another confusion is, on the same device, different channel, they can see similar voltage level waveform, you mentioned the phenomenon is ESD damage, so do you think all the ESD circuit are damaged at the same degree?

    BR

    Emma

  • Since we are now discussing this issue offline I'm going to go ahead and close this thread.

    Best,

    Malcolm