This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Tool/software:
Hi TI Team,
Could you please review the implementation of the level translator and share your review comments?
Also could you please clarify the below queries?
Thanks
Sandra
Also could you please suggest an alternate level translator that does not have to satisfy the condition "Vcca should be less than Vccb"
1. The schematic is incomplete. But as far as the components shown are concerned, this will work.
2. 4 Mbps will work if the other devices have push/pull outputs.
3. The level translator itself does not change and does not have a different configuration. The only relevant difference between push/pull and open-drain systems is the speed of rising edges; if the other devices output signals with fast edges, then the TXS also runs fast.
4. In the schematic, all eight signals are shown to be unidirectional. Unidirectional translators (e.g., TXU0104/TXU0204/TXU0304) would be a better choice, and have no supply restrictions.
Hi Clemens,
Thanks for your reply.
Can we use TXB0108RGYR as a drop in replacement for TXS0108ERGYR?
Also, will TXB0108RGYR support the UART interface?
What is the maximum speed this Level translator can support?
Hi Sandra,
Yes TXB can be used as a drop in replacement and can be used. May also see section 6.8 of the TXB data sheet specifying 60 Mbps.
Although I am not sure why interested in the replacement as UART is for fixed direction and the recommendation is typically to not use auto-bidirectional devices for applications that are not auto-bidirectional due to limitations such as 8.3.3 and 8.3.5 of the TXB data sheet. Hence, the TXU recommendation, thanks.
Best Regards,
Michael.