This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TXS0108E: design queries

Part Number: TXS0108E
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXU0304, TXU0104, TXU0204

Tool/software:

Hi TI Team,

Could you please review the implementation of the level translator and share your review comments?

Also could you please clarify the below queries?

  • Could you please verify the above schematics and confirm whether this implementation works?
  • Our application's required speed is 4Mbps, can we use this level translator for 4Mbps signals?
  • please confirm whether the configuration of this level translator is push-pull or open drain.

Thanks 

Sandra

  • Also could you please suggest an alternate level translator that does not have to satisfy the condition "Vcca should be less than Vccb"

  • 1. The schematic is incomplete. But as far as the components shown are concerned, this will work.

    2. 4 Mbps will work if the other devices have push/pull outputs.

    3. The level translator itself does not change and does not have a different configuration. The only relevant difference between push/pull and open-drain systems is the speed of rising edges; if the other devices output signals with fast edges, then the TXS also runs fast.

    4. In the schematic, all eight signals are shown to be unidirectional. Unidirectional translators (e.g., TXU0104/TXU0204/TXU0304) would be a better choice, and have no supply restrictions.

  • Hi Clemens,

    Thanks for your reply.

    Can we use TXB0108RGYR as a drop in replacement for TXS0108ERGYR?

    Also, will TXB0108RGYR support the UART interface?

    What is the maximum speed this Level translator can support?

  • Hi Sandra,

    Yes TXB can be used as a drop in replacement and can be used. May also see section 6.8 of the TXB data sheet specifying 60 Mbps.

    Although I am not sure why interested in the replacement as UART is for fixed direction and the recommendation is typically to not use auto-bidirectional devices for applications that are not auto-bidirectional due to limitations such as 8.3.3 and 8.3.5 of the TXB data sheet. Hence, the TXU recommendation, thanks.

    Best Regards,

    Michael.