This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
Yes this is possible. See this documentation for details on how to set this up : https://software-dl.ti.com/jacinto7/esd/processor-sdk-linux-jacinto7/09_01_00_06/exports/docs/linux/Foundational_Components/Kernel/Kernel_Drivers/Network/CPSW-PTP.html#ptp-with-transparent-clock-switch-mode
Regards,
Tanmay
Hi Tanmay,
We've looked at this documentation and tested it. We want tda4vh to both synchronize the time via gptp and forward the gptp. This mode seems to be called BC(Boundary Clock) mode, not TC(Transparent clock) mode(ptp4l(8): PTP Boundary/Ordinary/Transparent Clock (nwtime.org)). Does tda4vh support BC mode under linux natvier driver? How to implement the BC mode?
Best Regards,
Ruijie
Hi Ruijie,
I believe the boundary clock can be used by running ptp4l twice. Once in master mode and once in slave mode. on the device with switch.
Regards,
Tanmay
Hi Tanmay,
Any specific samples? It feels like this would lead to larger timing gap between different boards.
Best Regards,
Ruijie
Hi Ruijie,
No it won't won't as the CPTS clock used for timestamping in both the cases will be the same hardware clock.
I won't be able to try this anytime soon. Is it possible for you to try this out.
Regards,
Tanmay