This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Need TI experts' opinion on debug interfaces on OMAP 3503

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OMAP3503, OMAP3530

Hi All,


Omap3503 provides 3 external physical debug interfaces.

 

1.       ETM -Embedded Trace Macro Interface : http://www.arm.com/products/solutions/ETM.html

2.       SDTI -System Debug Trace Interface : reduced pin count alternative to JTAG with extra debug performance and error correction 

3.    JTAG 

 

We understand that JTAG is a standard and a more commonly used interface for board bringup, initial flash of firmware and debugging/troubleshooting.

 

In this regard, we want to know if there is any specific reason why TI supports ETM, SDTI and JTAG on OMAP 3503 ?  if yes what are pros and cons of using just JTAG as apposed to ETM and SDTI.

 

We need TI experts' opinion on these debug interfaces on OMAP 3503

 

Thanks & Regards,

-Subash