Hi All,
Omap3503 provides 3 external physical debug interfaces.
1. ETM -Embedded Trace Macro Interface : http://www.arm.com/products/solutions/ETM.html
2. SDTI -System Debug Trace Interface : reduced pin count alternative to JTAG with extra debug performance and error correction
3. JTAG
We understand that JTAG is a standard and a more commonly used interface for board bringup, initial flash of firmware and debugging/troubleshooting.
In this regard, we want to know if there is any specific reason why TI supports ETM, SDTI and JTAG on OMAP 3503 ? if yes what are pros and cons of using just JTAG as apposed to ETM and SDTI.
We need TI experts' opinion on these debug interfaces on OMAP 3503
Thanks & Regards,
-Subash