This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi everybody ,
on 8Gb memory moving from
From p.n.: MT41K512M16HA-125 AIT:A (DDR3 8Gb) (
To p.n. MT41K512M16VRP-107 AIT:P based on a dual-die package.
What consequences there are on the configuration of DDR controller moving from 2 p.n.
On p.n. MT41K512M16VRP-107 AIT:P I see page size per DIE =1KB
On p.n. MT41K512M16HA-125 AIT:A I see page size =2K
I need to configure inside Emif controller Bank/columns/Rows with different value?
what about multi die handling by EMIF ? any other concern / issue to take care ?
Best regards
Carlo
Hi Carlo,
As stated in the documentation, DRA74P does not support twin die.
EDIT: The above statement is in relation to loading on the signals. DRA74P does not support dual loading on the data bus, or more than 4 loads on the CA bus. Please always refer to the latest datasheet for loading restrictions.
Thanks,
Kevin
Kevin,
It's not twin die in the sense that you're thinking. Here's a snippet from the data sheet:
Uses two x8, 4Gb Micron die to make one x16 package
From an electrical load perspective, this is equivalent to using two 8-bit DDR3 devices, which is a supported configuration.
Best regards,
Brad
Colombo Carlo said:What consequences there are on the configuration of DDR controller moving from 2 p.n.
On p.n. MT41K512M16VRP-107 AIT:P I see page size per DIE =1KB
On p.n. MT41K512M16HA-125 AIT:A I see page size =2K
I need to configure inside Emif controller Bank/columns/Rows with different value?
You don't need to change the values from the EMIF perspective as it looks the same.
Colombo Carlo said:what about multi die handling by EMIF ? any other concern / issue to take care ?
This will change the loading on the address/control lines. Is the customer using VTT termination on the address/control (hopefully yes)? Ideally the customer should perform IBIS simulations for these two different devices to determine the optimum configuration of the drive strength, especially on the address/control lines where the loading will double. Data lines may also change slightly due to the fact that it's a different device, but it will still be a single load.
Carlo,
Does the customer have JTAG available on their board, plus a TI probe and CCS? If so, I have a script that will scrape their DDR configuration and do some analysis. The customer can download the script here:
http://git.ti.com/sitara-dss-files/am57xx-dss-files/blobs/raw/main/am57xx-ddr.dss
They should attempt to boot the board as usual (i.e. the DDR should be in its configured state), and then they should run the script by following the directions here:
http://git.ti.com/sitara-dss-files/am57xx-dss-files/blobs/main/README
The script will output a *.txt file to their desktop. Please post it here.
Best regards,
Brad
Hi Carlo,
Brad and I have discussed internally and agree that we don't see any specific issues with that device / topology. I apologize for the confusion.
Thanks,
Kevin